Ex Ord - Judgment Search Results

Skinner Vs. Orde and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1875)ILR1All230

1. The cause of action in this suit accrued to the plaintiff in August 1861, when his father died; and...

L.W. Orde Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Council

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1918All126(2); (1918)ILR40All367; 44Ind.Cas.923

value of this land to the appellant himself does not exceed the sum which has been allowed by the Collector, calculated failed, and he has appealed to this Court against the order of the District Judge. The memorandum of appeal before us

S.E. Orde Vs. Mrs. T.C. Deacon and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1952All582

is a fit case where we should interfere in the exercise of our revisional jurisdiction. We, therefore, allow this revision & Chief Justice in that case was of the opinion that Order 33, Rule 5, Civil P. C., was not exhaustive &

Mrs. G.H. Orde Vs. A. Skinner and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1945All331

in a list of her personal property, that is, to exercise her third option as allowed by the provisions of Sub-section Lal under Section 9 of the Act and, consequently, an order could be passed under the provisions of Sub-section 2 of

Gita Enterprises, a Partnership Firm Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Thr ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: AIR2007Jhar92; 2007(2)CTLJ415(Jhar); [2007(3)JCR382(Jhr)]

evasion of royalty at different levels. Such provision is in existence for more than 35 years. A person can always be placed upon contractors is not too onerous to be complied.29...In order to check evasion thereof the State must be deemed to

J.Poornachandra Babu Vs. the Senior Divisional Engineer/Co-ord/Gtl

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

appeal can be entertained by the appellate authority after the expiry of the above stipulated time. The applicant and the respondent giving the applicant an opportunity of hearing and communicate its order to the applicant within a period of four weeks from

Amar Singh and Others Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary to Govt ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh

1.1.2006. Para 6.1 of Annexure-I MACP Scheme is only for exercising option for coming over to the revised pay structure and from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The applicants have also prayed that para 9 of the

B. Ram Babu Vs. the Sr.Divisional Engineer (Co-ord), South Central Rai ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

academic year and his daughter is appearing for final year examinations of Intermediate in the month of March/April and his mother exigency and therefore this Tribunal cannot interfere with such discretionary orders. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that no officer is