Ex Mayor - Judgment Search Results
Mayor Vs. Educational Equality League
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-25-1974
Mayor v. Educational Equality League - 415 U.S. 605 (1974) U.S. Supreme Court Mayor v. Educational Equality League, 415 … complaint. The Court of Appeals reversed, concluding that respondents had established an unrebutted prima facie case of unlawful exclusion of Negroes from consideration for service on the 1971 Panel. Although Tate was succeeded, while the case was
Mayor Vs. Sheffield
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1866
Mayor v. Sheffield - 71 U.S. 189 (1866) U.S. Supreme Court Mayor v. Sheffield, 71 U.S. 4 Wall. 189 … to the reading of which the counsel of the city, for reasons which will appear in the argument, excepted -- the committee and street commissioner shortened the Park twenty feet, cut down a tree there, and threw
Banks Vs. Mayor
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1868
Banks v. Mayor - 74 U.S. 16 (1868) U.S. Supreme Court Banks v. Mayor, 74 U.S. 7 Wall. 16 16 (1868) … tax as had been assessed on federal securities made by the Constitution and statutes of the United States exempt from taxation, and the officers who were empowered to issue the obligations refused to sign them because, as
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Prasanna Paul.P. vs Mayor
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-16-2023
PAUL PRASAD, T.C. NO.19/2013-1, HARVYPURAM, LANE-1, PEROORKADA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695005 BY ADV M.DINESH RESPONDENTS: 1 MAYOR 2 SECRETARY BY ADV. SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.11.2023, THE … 16th day of November, 2023JUDGMENTThe limited relief sought for by the petitioner is for a direction to consider Ext.P6 representation submitted by her before the 2 nd respondent.2. The learned Standing Counsel submitted that, no assurancehave been
Kewal Krishan Mayor Vs. Kailash Chand Mayor and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2001
Reported in: 95(2002)DLT115
this Court partly decreeing the suit of plaintiff. RFA (OS) 31/76 is by the plaintiff Dr. Kewal Krishan Mayor and RFA (OS) 37/76 is by defendant No. 1 Kailash Chand Mayor.2. Bal Mukand Mayor s/o Dina Nath … made a declaration on affidavit dated 4.3.1963 and on that day threw his property 8/10 and 8/11, Western Extension Area, Karol Bagh, new Delhi into the common hotch potch of his Hindu undivided family comprising himself and
Kewal Krishan Mayor Vs. Kailash Chand Mayor and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-1976
Reported in: ILR1977Delhi97
This is a suit for partition of properties andhas arisen in the following circumstances.The plaintiff, Dr. Kewal Krishan Mayor, and defendant No. 1,Shri Kailash Chand Mayor, are the sons of late L. Bal Mukand whowas the son … L. BalMukand made a will on 5th of June, 1971 bequeathing all the properties to defendant No. 1 except house No. 8/10, W.E.A., KarolBagh, New Delhi which was bequeathed in favor of Miss ShashiBala, daughter of defendant
Watkins Mayor and Co. Vs. Jullundur Electric Supply Co. Ltd.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-21-1953
Reported in: AIR1955P& H133
between the plaintiff, the Jullundur Electric Supply Company Limited (hereinafter termed the Company), and the defendants, Messers. Watkins Mayor and Company, Jullundur (hereinafter called the consumers), for the supply of electric energy. The relevant conditions of this … in that case at the rate of Re. 0-1-3 per unit of energy consumed and if the consumption exceeded 3,00,000 units in two years, the rate was to be Re. 0-1-0 per unit subject to certain conditions.
The Mayor Jaipur Municipal Corporation Vs. Thakur Shiv Raj Singh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-05-2019
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO.6030 OF2019(arising out of SLP(C)No.7710 of 2019) THE MAYOR JAIPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. … APPELLANT(S) THAKUR SHIV RAJ SINGH & ORS. … RESPONDENT(S) VERSUS JUDGMENT ASHOK … appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents may be directed to refund the amount of Rupees 1,01,04,672/- charged/ extracted by the respondents towards conversion charges of the land in question and an amount of Rupees 6,31,542/- and
The Mayor Municipal Corporation Vs. Govind Bajirao Navpute and Ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-17-2020
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2237 OF2020(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.25967 of 2016) The Mayor Municipal Corporation …Appellant vs Govind Bajirao Navpute & Ors. ...Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.2240 OF2020(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) … the High Court has set aside the order dated 29.03.2016 passed by the Director of Town Planning, granting extension of time for submitting draft development plan to Government. Further, it is held that the Planning Authority has
Rakesh Mayor and Another Vs. M/S Vigneshwara Developers Pvt. Ltd. and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-23-2015
COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on 23rd July, 2015 % + C.S. (OS) No.516/2012 RAKESH MAYOR & ANOTHER Through ..... Plaisntiffs Mr. Vishal Verma, Adv. along with plaintiff No.1 in person. versus M/S VIGNESHWARA … defendants offers and believing the representations made by defendants to be true during the meeting with their Marketing Executives/Directors at defendant's site at Orchid Center, 2nd Floor, Golf Course Road, Sec. 53, Gurgaon agreed to invest in
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free