Evidence Act Sections 92 - Judgment Search Results

Sukumar Namasudra and Another Vs. Bhojan Namasudra and Others

Court: Guwahati

the learned appellate court in respect of the Ext. 3 is perverse and valid as per Section 92, Evidence Act? 2. Whether the vendor of Ext. 3 got valid right and title to transfer title to the purchaser … finding of the learned appellate court in respect of the Ext. 3 is perverse and valid as per Section 92, Evidence Act? 2. Whether the vendor of Ext. 3 got valid right and title to transfer title

Vasu @ Bhaskaran Vs. Parukutty Amma and Another

Court: Kerala

have signed, they are strictly not contracts so as to attract under Sections 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act. The learned appellate Judge was not justified in reversing the decree after dislodging the findings recorded by the

Rajammal Vs. A.P. Mani

Court: Chennai

the trial Court by holding that the defence of the defendant is hit by Section 92 of Indian Evidence Act. Thus, the appellate Court decreed the suit as prayed for, by directing the defendant to receive the balance … (Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree dated 23.09.2014 made in A.S.No.64 of 2012 on the file

Food Corporation of India Vs. Manipal and Sons

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1985(1)WLN780

was accepted.23. Mr. Shishodia while challenging the above finding had laid much stress on Section 92 of the Evidence Act. According to him when the agreement or contract is in writing no amount of oral evidence can be … pertinent question regarding application of the principles enunciated by the Apex Court in the above judgment while interpreting Sections 91 and 92 with special reference to proviso (6) of the Indian Evidence Act. A plain reading of

Dondapati Lakshminarasimha Rao Dondapati Rama Rao Vs. Gundabathula Rag ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 162Ind.Cas.53a

the plaintiffs by Mr. P. Somasundaram that the agreement pleaded is in contravention of Section 92(4) of the Evidence Act and therefore, should not be received in evidence and all that the defendants would be entitled to, will … appeal on behalf of the plaintiffs by Mr. P. Somasundaram that the agreement pleaded is in contravention of Section 92(4) of the Evidence Act and therefore, should not be received in evidence and all that the defendants

Tiruvengada Ayyangar Vs. Rangasami Nayak

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1883)ILR7Mad19

behalf of the plaintiff, the District Judge was of opinion that with reference to Section 92 of the Evidence Act no evidence could be received of any contemporaneous oral agreement to add to the terms of the mortgage … On appeal made on behalf of the plaintiff, the District Judge was of opinion that with reference to Section 92 of the Evidence Act no evidence could be received of any contemporaneous oral agreement to add to

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Sahaswan District Badaun Through Its Secre ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2004(3)ALD45(SC); 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)213; 2004(2)AWC1176(SC); (SCSuppl)2004(3)CHN1; 109(2004)DLT356(SC); 2004(73)DRJ709; [2004(2)JCR217(SC)]; (2004)137PLR70; 2004(1)SCALE332;

land. As stated above the sale deed was for Rs. 15.40 per sq. yard. Section 92 of the Evidence Act precludes a party from leading evidence contrary to the terms of a written document. It was, therefore, not … Appeals stand disposed of accordingly. There will be no order as to cost Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 18, 23 - Evidence Act - Section 92 - Market value of acquired land - Determination

Biji Pothen, Residing at Karingadaveedu, Nedumkunnam Village Vs. Mrs. ...

Court: Kerala

that as against the amount mentioned in Ext.B3 (Rs.50,000/-) appellant is barred from pleading, under Sec.92 of the Evidence Act (for short, "the Act") that the sale consideration was Rs.8,00,000/-. 9. Though, in the written statement respondents 2 … III. Parties shall suffer their cost through out. All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed. Civil Procedure Code, Section 100 and Section 51(c ) - Registration Act, Section 34(2) and Section 60(1) - Indian Evidence Act, Section

Rajamma Vs. Dr. V. Sukumar

Court: Kerala

a true statement, evidence is admissible to prove that the transfer is only a gift. S.92 of the Evidence Act will not be a bar, in such cases, for proving the absence of consideration. 8. In this context, … the appeal. However, the parties are directed to bear their respective costs. Transfer of Property Act 1882 - Sections 54, 113 and 122, Contract Act 1872 - Sections 2(d) and 16, Hindu Succession Act, Travancore Nair Act

Mettilbai Vs. Balammal (Died) and Others

Court: Chennai Madurai

(b) Whether the Courts below are right in deciding the issue contra to Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act accepting the oral evidence and rejecting the recitals in the registered document? 9. The admitted facts are the … has been satisfied.Three yearsWhen the mortgagor re-enters on the mortgaged property. 18. It is also appropriate to incorporate Sections 58(d) of the Transfer of Property Act, which is as follows: 58(d) Usufructuary mortgage - Where the mortgagor