Evidence Act Section 114 E - Judgment Search Results
Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise Vs. Hongo India (P) Ltd. an ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-27-2009
Reported in: (2009)5SCC791
conclusion, we confirm the decision of the High Court. Hence, all the appeals are accordingly dismissed. No costs. Section 114 & Order 47, Rule 1: [K.G. Balakrishnan, C.J. & P. Sathasivam & J.M. Panchal, JJ] Inherent powers Correction … acts and proceedings are to be enrolled in a perpetual memorial and testimony. A court of record is undoubtedly a superior court which is itself … in the Act for condoning delay particularly in Section 35H in lieu of Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, Section 5 of the Limitation Act is applicable and the High Court ought to have exercised its power by … of the reference application under unamended Section 35 H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") beyond the prescribed period
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Mohan Lal Gupta and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-04-2000
Reported in: [2000(87)FLR231]; JT2000(10)SC228; (2000)IILLJ1597SC
order of the Labour Court. The termination order as passed by the appellant-Corporation stands restored. No costs. - Section 114: [S.B. Sinha & Markandey Katju, JJ] Presumption Effect - Claim of title Held, Presumption by itself would not … situation at this stage of the proceedings under Article 136 of the Constitution. The finding as regards the proof of charges shall have to be taken as accepted and we do not see any perversity therein, having … order of termination and imposed a minor penalty in regard to gross acts of misdemeanor. Unfortunately, however, by reason of the summary rejection of the … the Constitution filed by the Corporation. The respondent No. 1 being an employee of U.P. State Road Transport Corporation moved the Labour Court against an
Shahzadi Begum Vs. Badrunnissa Begum and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-05-2000
Reported in: JT2000(10)SC239
petitions were not decided on merits. Plaintiff as well as the defend ant were also allowed to lead evidence in this matter. The High Court also directed that the status quo as on date should be maintained. … suit will proceed and will be disposed of in accordance with law.10. This appeal is accordingly allowed. - Section 114: [S.B. Sinha & Markandey Katju, JJ] Presumption Effect - Claim of title Held, Presumption by itself would not … on part of other. [2000 AIHC 2029 (AP) Reversed]. -- SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 [C.A. No. 47/1963]. Section 34: Suit for recovery of possession Termination … observations made by learned Single Judge of Andhra Pradesh High Court while entertaining an appeal under Order 43, Rule 1 C.P.C. against the order of
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jeet Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-15-2000
Reported in: JT2001(2)SC70; (2000)9SCC588
the testimony of defence witnesses and found the prosecution story to be reliable on the strength of the evidence adduced by the prosecution witnesses. Accordingly, he reached the conclusion that both the appellants were in possession of … as for each of the appellants. Fine amount will remain undisturbed.13. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. - Section 114: [S.B. Sinha & Markandey Katju, JJ] Adverse inference Non examination of party to suit Held, Adverse inference can … have been convicted by a Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (for short 'TADA') for the offence under Section 5 … the case against the appellants is that they were caught red-handed with explosive substances during the untimely hours of 28.10.1992 i.e. around 1.00 a.m. in
Gujarat State Cooperative Agriculture and Rural Development and ors. V ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-17-2011
during the pendency and final decision of this petition will be subject to final outcome of this petition. Section 114 & Order 47, Rule 1: [K.G. Balakrishnan, C.J. & P. Sathasivam & J.M. Panchal, JJ] Inherent powers Correction … Counsel, Mr.Nanavaty that the present petitioner No.1 is a Central Co-operative Bank registered under the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act, 1961 ('the Act' for short) and other petitioners are newly elected members of Board of Directors of the … Societies Act, 1961 ('the Act' for short) and other petitioners are newly elected members of Board of Directors of the petitioner No.1. Since the petitioner
Bhanu Prokash SrivastavA. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata Appellate
Decided on: Feb-11-2011
xerox certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties as expeditiously as possible. Section 114 & Order 47, Rule 1: [K.G. Balakrishnan, C.J. & P. Sathasivam & J.M. Panchal, JJ] Inherent powers Correction … the selection process, condoning his age bar, as his case was pending before this Court and he has acted bonafide pursuant to the decision of the school and spent valuable part of his life. In the event, … Assistant Teacher in one of such sanctioned posts for the subject of Economics on 12th August, 1992. The petitioner has been continuously working in the
M/S. Herbicides (India) Ltd. Vs. M/S. Shashank Pesticides P.Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-13-2011
effected when it is sent to the correct address by registered post. Similar presumption can be raised under Section 114 (e) of Evidence Act, once it is proved that a letter by registered post was sent at the correct
The Madras Port Trust, Represented by Its Chairman Vs. V. Ramalingam,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-08-2003
Reported in: (2003)2MLJ382
be dismissed. They are accordingly dismissed. No costs. Connected W.P.M.Ps and C.M.Ps are closed. Service - promotion - Section 114 and Order 43 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Major Port Trust Act, 1963 - … This judgment will dispose of Review Application No. 68 of 2001 in W.A. No. 1251 of 2000, which emanated from W.P. No. 11938 of 1993. The judgment will also cover C.M.P. No. 13438 of 2001, which is
Smt. Sunder Devi and anr. Vs. Jhaboo Lal and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-22-1956
Reported in: AIR1957All215
of considerable importance leave to file a special appeal is granted. Family - succession - Section 114 of Evidence Act, 1872 - Muslim woman living with a Hindu as wife - converted to Hinduism and classed as a … in the shape of a share in a sugar mill and, according to the plaintiffs, also some jewellery etc. The share and jewellery were taken over by defendants 1 to 4 and the suit which has given
Nehru @ Jawahar Vs. State of Chhatisgarh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jun-13-2008
Reported in: AIR2008SC2574; 2008(2)ALD(Cri)387; 2008(56)BLJR2068; 2008CriLJ3490; 2008(9)SCALE437; (2008)7SCC341; 2008(2)LC791(SC)
was of no consequence as she was below 16 years of age. In any event, there was no evidence of any consent. The trial court found the age of the victim to be around 16 years. But … the victim in her cross-examination proved that the plea of consent was without substance - Appeal dismissed - Section 114: [S.B. Sinha & Markandey Katju, JJ] Presumption Effect - Claim of title Held, Presumption by itself would not … on part of other. [2000 AIHC 2029 (AP) Reversed]. -- SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 [C.A. No. 47/1963]. Section 34: Suit for recovery of possession Termination … Report was lodged around 11 A.M., and she was sent for medical examination. The accused after his arrest on 12th June, 1988 was sent for
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free