Evasion - Judgment Search Results
Commercial Taxes Officer, Anti-evasion Vs. Auto and Bearings
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-20-2000
Reported in: [2001]121STC304(Raj); 2002(1)WLN489
Rajesh Balia, J.1. These five revisions arise out of the common order dated December 21, 1996 passed by the Rajasthan Tax Board, Ajmer, and also involve common questions and, therefore, they were heard together and are...
Cto Anti Evasion Circle Iii Rajasthan Jaipur Vs. M/S Prasoon Enterpris ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-26-2019
COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3198 OF2019(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.11937 of 2017) CTO, Anti Evasion, Circle III, Rajasthan, Jaipur ….Appellant(s) VERSUS M/s Prasoon Enterprises, Jaipur ….Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL Nos.31993200 OF2019(Arising out of
Cto, Anti Evasion-i, Commercial Taxes Vs. Raghvar India Ltd.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-03-2006
Reported in: RLW2006(3)Raj2028; 2006(4)WLC369
Matched in: Parties Cto, Anti Evasion-i, Commercial Taxes Vs. Raghvar India Ltd.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hitech Carbon Products and anr Vs. Inspector, Anti-evasion Central Exc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-1999
Reported in: 1999VIAD(Delhi)205; 82(1999)DLT89; 1999(51)DRJ653; 2000(67)ECC58
Matched in: Parties Hitech Carbon Products and anr Vs. Inspector, Anti-evasion Central Excise, N.D
Orkay Polyester Vs. Director, Anti-evasion, C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-22-1997
Reported in: (2003)(161)ELT227Tri(Mum.)bai
1. First appellant was at the relevant time engaged in a manufacture of pre-oriented yarn (POY for short) and was also engaged in texturising such yarn. The other five appellants manufactured texturised yarn from POY and...
Assistant Commissioner, Anti Evasion Commercial Taxes, Bharatpur Vs. A ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-22-2007
Reported in: JT2007(4)SC297; 2007(3)SCALE420; 2007[6]STR164; 2007AIRSCW2987
the appellant, and imposed cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be paid personally by the Commercial Tax Officer, Anti Evasion, Bharatpur who passed the assessment order dated 14.9.2001.3. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:Penalty under Section
M/S.Mamta Surgical Cotton Industries Vs. Asstt. Commnr.(Anti-evasion), ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7084 OF2005|M/s Mamta Surgical Cotton | | |Industries, Rajasthan |..Appellant(s) | Versus |Assistant Commissioner | | |(Anti-Evasion), Bhilwara, Rajasthan |..Respondent(s) | WITH CIVIL APPEAL...
Asstt. Commissioner (Anti-evasion-i) Vs. Swaraj Mazda Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-12-2000
Reported in: JT2000(2)SC281; (2001)9SCC404; [2001]121STC255(SC)
Matched in: Parties Asstt. Commissioner (Anti-evasion-i) Vs. Swaraj Mazda Ltd.
Vikas Gumber vs Commissioner of Cgst, Anti Evasion Branch, Delhi East
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
GUMBER .....Applicant Through: Mr. Pradeep Jain, Mr. Sambhav Jain and Mr. Pranav Roy Singh, Advocates.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CGST, ANTI EVASION BRANCH, DELHI EAST .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Khatri, SSC with Ms. Shelly Dixit, Advocate for CGSTCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
M/S. a. M Pharmaceuticals India Pvt. Ltd., vs Additional Commissioner ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-28-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 7TH ASHADHA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 9652 OF 2023 PETITIONER: SALEEM KUNNATHODI,AGED 52 YEARS...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free