Evaluator - Judgment Search Results

Evaluative Finance and Investment Private Limited (In vol.liqn,) Vs... ...

Court: Delhi

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:31. 10.2017 $~CP-50 * % + CO.PET. 58/2017 EVALUATIVE FINANCE AND INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED (IN VOL.LIQN,) Through Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv. for OL. ........ Petitioner CORAM: HON'BLE

The Registrar (evaluation) Vs. Mr Mohammed Azvin

Court: Karnataka

August 2018. You are permitted to appear for all concerned examinations during Dec 2018/Jan 2019 onwards. Sd/- REGISTRAR EVALUATION To, 4SN17ME054-MOHAMMED AZVIN H K NEAR PUTTU RURAL POLICE STATION ARAYAPPU SAMPYA PUTTUR -574210 KARNATAKA” -- x --

Saurodeep Bhattacharjee and Others Vs. The Registrar (Evaluation), Raj ...

Court: Karnataka

arbitrary. They have sought for direction for further evaluation i.e., re-evaluation either on the ground that the first evaluator has not awarded proper marks or that the second evaluator. It is stated, by the act of evaluators

Shashank S. Reddy Vs. Registrar (evaluation)

Court: Karnataka

whereof, reads as under: “b) In the answer paper, if the difference in the marks awarded between four evaluators is equal to or more than 15%, such answer papers shall be referred to 5th valuation.11. The Co-ordinate

Mr. Shashi Kumar Vs. The Registrar (evaluation)

Court: Karnataka

R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF MARCH, 2022 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P. KRISHNA BHAT WRIT PETITION NO.1120 OF2022(EDN-RES) CONNECTED WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1160 OF2022(EDN-RES) IN W.P. NO.1120/2022:...

Mohammed Azvin H K Vs. The Registrar (evaluation)

Court: Karnataka

August 2018. You are permitted to appear for all concerned examinations during Dec 2018/Jan 2019 onwards. Sd/- REGISTRAR EVALUATION To, 4SN17ME054-MOHAMMED AZVIN H K NEAR PUTTU RURAL POLICE STATION ARAYAPPU SAMPYA PUTTUR -574210 KARNATAKA” -- x --

Mr. Dasari Chakradhar Vs. The Registrar (evaluation)

Court: Karnataka

R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF MARCH, 2022 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P. KRISHNA BHAT WRIT PETITION NO.1120 OF2022(EDN-RES) CONNECTED WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1160 OF2022(EDN-RES) IN W.P. NO.1120/2022:...

Vishweshwara C Vs. Registrar(evaluation)

Court: Karnataka

whereof, reads as under: “b) In the answer paper, if the difference in the marks awarded between four evaluators is equal to or more than 15%, such answer papers shall be referred to 5th valuation.11. The Co-ordinate

C.K.Joshy vs District Level Evaluation Committee

Court: Kerala

ARIYANOOR P.O, KANDANASSERY, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 102. BY ADV SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENTS :- 1 DISTRICT LEVEL EVALUATION COMMITTEE THRISSUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, AYYANTHOLE - 680 001. 2 THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE

R. Srikanth Reddy Vs. the Registrar (Evaluation) and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2004KAR684

learned Counsel appearing for the respondents. After careful perusal of the material available on record and after thorough evaluation of the material available on file, with the assistance of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, in