Estate - Judgment Search Results

Hyacintia Real Estate Developers Private Limited vs.dlf Real Estate Bu ...

Court: Delhi

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO. APPL. (M) 156/2016 IN THE MATTER OF: HYACINTIA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED … Applicant No.1 / Transferor Company No.1 AND KAVICON PARTNERS LIMITED …… Applicant No.2 /

Great India Estate Pvt.Ltd vs Real Estate Regulatory Authority

Court: Kerala

THE 26TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 5TH JYAISHTA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 12583 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: GREAT INDIA ESTATE PVT.LTD AGED 68 YEARS NEW CORPORATION BUILDING GROUND FLOOR,PALLAYAM, THIRUVANNATHAPURAM REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN E.M.NAJEEB AGED 68 YEARS,

Max Estates Limited and anr. Vs. Malsi Estates Limited

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [2008]141CompCas341(P& H); (2007)146PLR395; [2008]86SCL219(Punj& Har)

Act, 1956 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act') is for sanction of Scheme of Amalgamation between Max Estates Limited (hereinafter to be referred as 'the transferor company') and Malsi Estate Limited (hereinafter to be referred as

Ajit Estates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Arvind Estates Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act for short) has been filed by Ajit Estates Private Limited (Transferor Company No.1), Nexus Realtors Private Limited (Transferor Company No.2), Mandarin Estates Private Limited (Transferor Company

Pickadali Real Estate Pvt. Ltd, Delhi/Karnal Vs. Horizon Estates Priva ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR NO.830 OF 201.th DATE OF DECISION :7. DECEMBER, 2012 Pickadali Real Estate PVT.LTD.Delhi/Karnal …. Petitioner Versus Horizon Estates Private Limited, Delhi & others …. Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE L.N.MITTAL

Estate of Late Gen. Sir Shankar S.S.J.B. Rana Vs. Controller of Estate ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1990(3)BomCR36; (1990)87CTR(Bom)53; [1990]186ITR578(Bom)

T.D. Sugla, J.1. In this estate duty reference at the instance of the Department, the Tribunal has referred to this court only one question

Estate of Kisandas Vs. Controller of Estate Duty

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1989]178ITR259(Mad)

following questions of law have been referred for the opinion of this court under section 64(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') : '(1) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of

Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Estate of Late W.S. Seshachala Gramani

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1989)77CTR(Mad)246; [1989]180ITR431(Mad)

Ratnam, J.1. At the instance of the Revenue, under section 64(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the following questions of law have been referred to

Estate of Late S.V. Rajammal (by Accountable Person S.V. Venkatasubbu) ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1992]197ITR55(Mad)

Ratnam, J.1. In these tax case references under section 64(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), at the instance of the accountable person and the

Kumari Estate Workers' Union, Nagercoil Vs. Modaile Easwari Estate, Po ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1991)IILLJ500Mad

interfering with the right of the plaintiffs (the workers) from doing the tapping works in the 1st respondent estate, the Government cannot make a reference to the Labour Court on the very same issue of non-employment of