Escort - Judgment Search Results

Escorts Jcb Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-ii

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC3708; 2002(84)ECC225; 2002LC545(SC); 2002(146)ELT31(SC); JT2002(8)SC298; 2002(7)SCALE475; (2003)1SCC281; [2002]SUPP3SCR261

dated 24.3.98 to he assessee saying that an open policy for transit risks in the name of M/s. Escorts JCB Ltd. and their bankers appear in the column for the name of Assured but there is no

Escorts Finance Ltd. Vs. Fidelity Industries Ltd. and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2003]117CompCas282(Mad)

P. Sathasivam, J.1. In Company Application No. 403 of 2002, the applicant First Leasing Company of India Ltd., has prayed for an order to declare that the charge created by the second respondent-company (Fidelity Industries Ltd.--in...

M/S. Escorts Ltd. Vs. Commnr. of Central Excise, Faridabad

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6561 OF2004M/S. ESCORTS LTD. …APPELLANT VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, FARIDABAD ...RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.457 OF2006WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS.9469-9470 OF2010JUDGMENT

Escorts Ltd. Vs. Universal Tractor Holding Llc

Court: Supreme Court of India

Petition No.372 of 2010.2. The short facts leading to this petition are this wise: The respondent herein and Escorts Agri Machinery Inc., (“Escorts AMI”) which was a subsidiary of the petitioner, were holding following percentage of shares

M/S Escorts Ltd. Vs. Rama Mukherjee

Court: Supreme Court of India

OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1457 OF 201.(Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No.7325 of 2012) M/s. Escorts Limited … Appellant Versus Rama Mukherjee … Respondent JUDGMENT Jagdish Singh Khehar, J.1. This Court on 21.2.2013 directed

All Escorts Employees Union Vs. The State of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 12843-12844 OF2017(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 27020-27021 OF2015 ALL ESCORTS EMPLOYEES UNION .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.Leave granted.2) The appellant-Union, known

All Escorts Employees Union Vs. The State of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION M.A. NOS. 1744-1745 OF2017IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 12843-12844 OF2017ALL ESCORTS EMPLOYEES UNION .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.Application for intervention is

Escorts Farms Ltd., Previously Known as Escorts Farms (Ramgarh) Ltd. V ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2004SC2186; JT2004(2)SC481; 2004(2)SCALE607; (2004)4SCC281

grant was unable to develop the land within the permissible period, they entered into an agreement with M/s Escorts (Agricultural Machines) Ltd. The two aforementioned companies agreed to form a third company in the name of M/s

Escorts Ltd. and anr. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC3425; 2003(86)ECC529; 2003(153)ELT263(SC); JT2003(3)SC329; 2003(3)SCALE324; (2003)4SCC285; [2003]2SCR1052

ORDERSyed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. These appeals, by the assessees [M/s.Escorts Limited and M/s.Goetze (India) Limited], are from the order of the customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in Appeal Nos. 421-454 of...

Escorts Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2004(96)ECC1; 2004(171)ELT145(SC); JT2004(7)SC1; (2005)1MLJ153(SC); 2004(7)SCALE285; (2004)7SCC214

S. N. Variava, J.1. These Appeals are against the Judgment dated 17th March, 2003 passed by the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (for short CEGAT).2. Briefly stated the facts are as follows:The Appellants are...