Entitled - Judgment Search Results

Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra and anr. Vs. Govt. of U.P. and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1997)9SCC215

G.N. Ray and; G.B. Pattanaik, JJ.1. The election of the Gram Panchayats in the State of Bihar had taken place long back in the year 1978 and the election of Block/Panchayat Samitis and the Zila Parishads...

Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra, Dehradun and ors. Vs. State o ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC652; 1985(2)SCALE906; (1985)2SCC431; [1985]3SCR169; 1985(17)LC594(SC)

for serving of such notices on the lessees or other interested parties. The Bandyopadhyay Committee will also be entitled before expressing its opinion on the scheme or schemes submitted to it, to hear the petitioner, the interventionists

Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra, Dehradun and ors. Vs. State o ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC1259; 1985(2)SCALE119; (1985)3SCC614; 1985(17)LC642(SC)

category A by the Bhargav Committee. We would therefore hold that M/s. Punjab Lime and Limestone Company are entitled to carry on mining operations in this limestone quarry falling within lease no. 96 in the same manner

Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC359; 1986(2)SCALE1083; 1986Supp(1)SCC517; [1987]1SCR641; 1987(1)LC132(SC)

enshrined in Article 51A(g) of the Constitution. 21. We are of the view that the Kendra should be entitled to the costs of this proceeding. We assess the same at Rs. 10.000 and direct the State of

Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC2426; JT1987(4)SC122; 1987(2)SCALE790; 1987Supp(1)SCC487

and notwithstanding such a stay order or other interim order or subsisting lease, the lessees shall not be entitled to carry on any mining activity whatsoever in any of these lime stone quarries and shall desist from

Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra Vs. State of U. P.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC2187; (1989)1CompLJ105(SC); JT1988(3)SC787; 1988(2)SCALE1574; 1989Supp(1)SCC504; [1988]Supp2SCR690; 1988(2)LC680(SC)

mine was running under the first grant or under Court's orders after its expiry, it would not be entitled to take advantage of the position. Similar order was made in regard to the B category mines situated

Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1988(4)SC710; 1988(2)SCALE493; 1989Supp(2)SCC384

ORDER1. This miscellaneous application is by a mining lessee in the Boon Valley area whose right to mining came to an end in view of the judgment of this Court on 30th of August, 1988 with...

Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra, Dehardun and Others Vs. State ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1991SC2216; 1992(40)BLJR193; JT1991(5)SC232; 1991(1)SCALE904; (1991)3SCC347; 1991(2)LC263(SC)

ORDER1. We are concerned here with Mining Lease No. 99. By a decision of this Court dated 30th August, 1988 in Writ Petitions 8209 & 8821 of 1983 (1989) Su. 1 SCR 504 an exception was...

Annie George vs Accountant General (Accounts and Entitlement )

Court: Kerala

case of the petitioner that the petitioner is a senior citizen whoaged 88 years and the legal heir entitled to receive the benefit of GPF Account No.MDL-308448 which was in the name of her daughter, Dr. Mini

K.PRAKASH Vs The Accountant General (Accounts and Entitlements)

Court: Chennai

on 31.01.1991. Thereafter, she passed away on 09.09.2019. The petitioner being the nominee of his deceased mother, is entitled for funeral expenses and death claim benefits and family pension arrears. Therefore, the petitioner made representations to the