Entertainment - Judgment Search Results

Beyond Dreams Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Zee Entertainment ...

Court: Mumbai

Plaintiff No.1 is a production house engaged in production of entertainment content for television including TV serials. Plaintiff Nos.2 and 3

Y.T. Entertainment Limited a Company Incorporated Under the Provisions ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(6)BomCR148

M/s. R F C Limited now changed to Y. T. Entertainment Ltd. And respondents 2 and 3 for the film titled

Popcorn Entertainment Corporation, Through Is Proprietor Shri Nilesh G ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(6)BomCR52

However, the petitions filed by M/s. Popcorn and M/s. Platinum Entertainment are the subject matter of remand order passed by the

Brown Vs. Entertainment Merchants Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

Assn. - 08-1448 (2011) OPINION OF THE COURT BROWN V. ENTERTAINMENT MERCHANTS ASSN. 564 U. S. ____ (2011) SUPREME COURT OF

Popcorn Entertainment and anr. Vs. the City and Industrial Development ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(2)BomCR880; 2006(5)MhLj450

are unable to accept this submission that the existence of entertainment facilities in a particular town is a matter of grave

Entertainment Tax Officer and anr. Vs. Ambae Picture Palace

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1993(6)SC221; 1993(4)SCALE295; (1994)1SCC209; [1993]Supp3SCR453; [1995]96STC338(SC)

of Entertainments Tax in the State, whereby the proprietors of entertainments are liable to pay tax on the gross collection capacity

Entertainment Tax Officer, Madhapur Circle, Hyderabad Vs. Geeta Enterp ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(11)SCALE170; (2008)8SCC134; (2009)11VatReporter33; (2008)16VST461(SC); 2008AIRSCW6384

Tax Rules that dealt with the details concerning payment of entertainment tax on slab basis. Sub-rule (13) of Rule 27 provided

Entertaining Enterprises, Madras and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1984Mad278

ground that it deals with the question of eligibility to entertainment tax and not the question as to the legislative competence,

Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. Vs. HT Media Limited

Court: Delhi

suit was brought after it came to the knowledge of Entertainment Network that HT Media had applied for trademark registration for

Impresario Entertainment & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. Vs.s & D Hospitality

Court: Delhi

decisions reported as Indian Performing Rights Society (supra), World Wrestling Entertainment (supra), Manu/DE/3072/2009 Banyan Tree Holding (P) Ltd. vs. A. Murali