Entertained - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: entertained Page 1 of about 226 results (0.025 seconds)Beyond Dreams Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Zee Entertainment ...
Court: Mumbai
case is the defendants. Creator provides raw material to the entertainment industry, themes or concepts, originates from the person who has
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTY.T. Entertainment Limited a Company Incorporated Under the Provisions ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 2009(6)BomCR148
M/s. R F C Limited now changed to Y. T. Entertainment Ltd. And respondents 2 and 3 for the film titled
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPopcorn Entertainment Corporation, Through Is Proprietor Shri Nilesh G ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 2009(6)BomCR52
City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO for short) for erecting entertainment complex in Navi Mumbai. Whereas third petitioner -M/s. Platinum Square
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrown Vs. Entertainment Merchants Assn.
Court: US Supreme Court
They show at best some correlation between exposure to violent entertainment and minuscule real-world effects, such as childrens feeling more aggressive
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPopcorn Entertainment and anr. Vs. the City and Industrial Development ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 2007(2)BomCR880; 2006(5)MhLj450
affected it may be that a writ petition could be entertained and it was contended placing heavy reliance on the judgment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEntertainment Tax Officer and anr. Vs. Ambae Picture Palace
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: JT1993(6)SC221; 1993(4)SCALE295; (1994)1SCC209; [1993]Supp3SCR453; [1995]96STC338(SC)
This continued till December 31, 1983.4. By the Andhra Pradesh Entertainments Tax (Amendment) Ordinance, 1983 certain amendments were brought about. This
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEntertainment Tax Officer, Madhapur Circle, Hyderabad Vs. Geeta Enterp ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: 2008(11)SCALE170; (2008)8SCC134; (2009)11VatReporter33; (2008)16VST461(SC); 2008AIRSCW6384
in Sub-rule (13) of Rule 27 of the Andhra Pradesh Entertainment Tax Rules, 1939. The Andhra Pradesh High Court has interpreted
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEntertaining Enterprises, Madras and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: AIR1984Mad278
to 'do ' with the levy, assessment or collection, of entertainment tax. The said section merely enables the owner of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEntertainment Network (India) Ltd. Vs. HT Media Limited
Court: Delhi
Thus describing each of the websites/links mentioned in the affidavit, Entertainment Network has sought to distinguish the other users of word
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTImpresario Entertainment & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. Vs.s & D Hospitality
Court: Delhi
is expanding pan India based on the application cannot be entertained for the reason mere filing of a trademark application does
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>