Entertain - Judgment Search Results

Beyond Dreams Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Zee Entertainment ...

Court: Mumbai

Plaintiff No.1 is a production house engaged in production of entertainment content for television including TV serials. Plaintiff Nos.2 and 3

Y.T. Entertainment Limited a Company Incorporated Under the Provisions ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(6)BomCR148

M/s. R F C Limited now changed to Y. T. Entertainment Ltd. And respondents 2 and 3 for the film titled

Popcorn Entertainment Corporation, Through Is Proprietor Shri Nilesh G ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(6)BomCR52

first two petitioners, namely, M/s. Popcorn Entertainment and M/s. Platinum Entertainment. So far as third petitioner i.e. M/s. Platinum Square Trust

Brown Vs. Entertainment Merchants Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

v. Kendrick , 244 F. 3d 572, 578579 (CA7 2001); Entertainment Software Assn. v. Foti , 451 F. Supp. 2d 823,

Popcorn Entertainment and anr. Vs. the City and Industrial Development ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(2)BomCR880; 2006(5)MhLj450

are unable to accept this submission that the existence of entertainment facilities in a particular town is a matter of grave

Entertainment Tax Officer and anr. Vs. Ambae Picture Palace

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1993(6)SC221; 1993(4)SCALE295; (1994)1SCC209; [1993]Supp3SCR453; [1995]96STC338(SC)

the Entertainments Tax Acts in Andhra Pradesh.3. The Andhra Pradesh Entertainments Tax Act, 1939 (Act No. X of 1939) provided for

Entertainment Tax Officer, Madhapur Circle, Hyderabad Vs. Geeta Enterp ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(11)SCALE170; (2008)8SCC134; (2009)11VatReporter33; (2008)16VST461(SC); 2008AIRSCW6384

in this regard was Rule 27 of the A. P. Entertainments Tax Rules that dealt with the details concerning payment of

Entertaining Enterprises, Madras and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1984Mad278

of 1984. The first petitioner in that case is one Entertaining Enterprises carrying on the business of running a video cassette

Entertainment Network (India) Ltd. Vs. HT Media Limited

Court: Delhi

Thus describing each of the websites/links mentioned in the affidavit, Entertainment Network has sought to distinguish the other users of word

Impresario Entertainment & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. Vs.s & D Hospitality

Court: Delhi

to the defendant this Court has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the present suit for the reason the defendant neither has