Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Enterprise - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 11 2014

Enterprise Holdings, Inc Vs. Enterprise Auto Rentals

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-11-2014

NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: March 11, 2014 + CS(OS) No.489/2013 and I.A. 4224/2013 & I.A. 12412/2013 ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, INC ..... Plaintiff Through Dr.Sheetal Vohra, Adv. with Mr.N.Mahabir, Adv. versus ENTERPRISE AUTO RENTALS ..... Defendant Through


Jul 08 2019

Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs.adinath Enterprises & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-08-2019

on :30. h May, 2019 Date of decision :8. h July, 2019 + CS (OS) 453/2018 AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. …...Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sohan Singh Rana, Mrs. Bindra Rana, Ms.


Sep 12 1997

Cheema Enterprises Vs. Mayur Enterprises

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Sep-12-1997

J.N. Sarma, J.1. This revision application has been filed against an order dated 3-1-97 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nagaon Assam in Money Suit No. 33/94.2. A suit was filed for realisation of Rupees...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 10 2007

Ruchika Enterprises and ors. Vs. Shriram Enterprises

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-10-2007

Reported in: I(2008)BC162

C.L. Pangarkar, J.1. Rule. Returnable forthwith.Heard finally with consent of parties.2. This is an application under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code for quashing the proceedings under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act before the Judicial...


Aug 09 2010

Singhal Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Singhal Enterprises (Jharsuguda) Pvt ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-09-2010

The Court: This is an application by Mr. Mookerjees client for sanction of a scheme of de-merger. It is opposed by the clients of Mr. Basak. From what has been submitted before me, it appears that...


Aug 18 2010

Singhal Enterprises Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Singhal Enterprises [Jharsuguda] Pvt. ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-18-2010

The Court : Prayer for adjournment is made by Mr. Chatterjee on the ground that his clients appeal and stay application are awaiting consideration before the Honble Appeal Court. However, till date there is no stay....


Apr 20 1987

Jai Vijay Enterprises Vs. Ashish Enterprises and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-20-1987

Reported in: 1987(3)BomCR631; 1988MhLJ481

M.S. Deshpande, J.1. This writ petition in directed against the order, dated 17th September, 1984, passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Amravati, fixed the application before him for evidence of parties, without deciding the petitioner's preliminary...


Jan 31 2014

A.i. Enterprises Ltd. and Another Vs. Bram Enterprises Ltd. and Others

Court: Canada Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-31-2014

by Lillian Schelew and her four sons, Jeffrey, Michael, Bernard and Alan, through corporate entities. The respondents Bram Enterprises Ltd. and Jamb Enterprises Ltd. each owned 40 percent of Joyce. The four Schelew brothers owned equal numbers


Apr 25 2005

Golkonda Engineering Enterprises Limited Vs. Assistant Director Genera ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Apr-25-2005

Reported in: 2005(4)ALT247; 2006(1)ARBLR368(AP); IV(2005)BC95

Cables). The respondent-Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited is the successor to the Department of Telecommunications, a Government of India Enterprise. The respondent called for tenders by a notification dt. 7-8-2002 for the supply of PIJF cables. The applicant


Nov 02 2007

Union Enterprises Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-02-2007

Reported in: [2008(1)JCR493(Jhr)]

the Commissioner of Central Excise.4. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass:The petitioner M/s. Union Enterprises, Adityapur, Jamshedpur (hereinafter referred to as 'the assessee') are engaged in the manufacture of Ingots and Billets of


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial