Engineering Operations - Judgment Search Results
Executive Engineer (Operation) Vs. Executive Engineer (Operation)
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rs.No.3917 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:31.01.2014 Executive Engineer (Operation) Punjab State Electricity Board, Pathankot ...Appellant Versus Master Sahil and anoth er ...Respondents CORAM: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rakesh
The Superintending Engineer, Operation, Telangana State Southern Power ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-02-2025
Reported in: [2025]4S.C.R.543
[2025] 4 S.C.R. 543 : 2025 INSC 428 The Superintending Engineer, Operation, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd. & Ors. v. Ch. Bhaskara Chary (Civil Appeal No. 4724 … [2025] 4 S.C.R. 543 : 2025 INSC 428 The Superintending Engineer, Operation, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd. & Ors. v. Ch. Bhaskara Chary (Civil Appeal No. 4724 of
Chief Engineer/Operation Dakshini Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-06-2009
Reported in: 2009AIRSCW4474; AIR2009SC2564; 2009(7)SCALE470; (2009)7SCC355
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of a rule governing the conditions of service of the employees of the appellant-Corporation, is the question involved in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Divisional Electrical Engineer (Operation), Apseb and anr. Vs. T. Pall ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-31-2006
Reported in: 2006(2)ALD550; [2006(109)FLR478]
writ petition.2. Respondent No. 1 worked as Helper in the Office of petitioner No. 1, namely Divisional Electrical Engineer, Operations, A.P.S.E.B., Bhimavaram, West Godavari District. On the ground that respondent No. 1 collected illegal gratification of Rs.
Superintending Engineer (Operation), A.P. Southern Power Distribution ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-2005
Reported in: AIR2005AP460; 2005(5)ALT632
the light of the fact that the appeal A.S.No. 50 of 2004 itself was filed by the Superintending Engineer, (Operation), APSEB, Kadapa. Apart from this aspect of the matter, the learned Counsel also had drawn the attention
The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, Apse Board, Warangal an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-18-1996
Reported in: 1996(3)ALT546; (1997)IILLJ586AP
G. Bikshapathy, J.1. The Writ Appeal is directed against the orders of the learned single Judge in W.P. No. 7922/1993 dated February 23, 1994. 2. The Electricity Board is the Appellant in the Writ Appeal and...
Divisional Engineer (Operations), Apseb (Urban), Power House and ors. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-08-1996
Reported in: 1996(3)ALT365
Matched in: Parties Divisional Engineer (Operations), Apseb (Urban), Power House and ors. Vs. Shaik Mohammed
Divisional Electrical Engineer, Operation, A.P.S.E.B. Vs. Siripurapu V ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-10-2003
Reported in: I(2004)ACC685; 2004(1)ALD372; 2004(1)ALT476; [2004(101)FLR77]; (2004)ILLJ973AP
Boards which deal with education at levels other than that of the level at which Primary schools are operating. Thus for being recognised, the school has to be recognised by the Board and therefore, it has to
Superintending Engineer, Operation, Electricity Department and anr. Vs ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jun-24-1974
Reported in: [1976]38STC69(Orissa)
making an application in form No. 12 on 22nd June, 1959. Subsequently on 3rd December, 1959, the Superintending Engineer, petitioner No. 1, made similar applications for refund under Section 14-A of the Act. Those applications were rejected
The Superintending Engineer Operation, Apepdcl., Dasannapeta and Other ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
the appellants relied on the decision of National Commission reported in IV (2011) CPJ 530 (NC) in SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (ELEC.) MESCOM and ANR. V. KRISHNA POOJARY and ANR. in which the National Commission held that for death … per the inspection and enquiry conducted by them, the accident might have occurred due to electrical shock while operating the TV switch in the plug box and as the deceased switched on the TV and when there
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free