En - Judgment Search Results

En Veeka Construction Co. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1999(1)ARBLR298(Delhi); 77(1999)DLT155; 1998(47)DRJ726; (1999)121PLR49

Preliminary objection is also raised by the respondent that the entire claim of the petitioner was barred by limitation. The said

En Ar En Computers (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2006)(110)ECC565

from the following concerns and sold the same to M/s. En Ar En Computers (P) Ltd. and other customers: The contention

Mahendrapal Singh Vs. X. En. and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2003(3)WLN638

Prakash Tatia, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent No. 7 Caveator.2. Learned counsel for the...

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. M/S.En Yes Kay Enterprise ...

Court: Kerala

1 4 & 6 TO 13.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. M/S.EN YES KAY ENTERPRISES OLD NO. 67, NEW NO 72.AMBEDKAR SALAI, VALASARAVAKKOM, CHENNAI-600087, TAMIL

Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus. Vs. White-en-all Products

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT571Tri(Mum.)bai

become waste" refers to the situation whether inputs in their entity are lost. The bottles being broken is the waste which

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Dee Pee En Corporation

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2007)9STJ40CESTAT(Bang.)alore

1. This revenue appeal arises from OIA No. 15/2006 CE dated 20.1.2006.The Commissioner (Appeals) has noted that the penalty in...

Juggilal Kamlapat Vs. N.V. Internationale Crediet-En-Handels Vereening ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1955Cal65,58CWN731

accepted and acted upon it. Meanwhile the export duty was enhanced. On 20-11-1950 the parties agreed that the buyer would accept

Chairman/Managing Director, U.P. Power Corporation Limited, Vs. Jitend ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2008(116)FLR903]

make application within 5 years. The learned Judge did not entertain this submission and allowed the petition. Hence this appeal.4. Sri

Deo NaraIn Gupta Son of Late Jagarnath Gupta Vs. Mohammad Ahmad Saleem ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2006(2)AWC1499

deemed to be in service till 30.6.97 and would be entitled to all consequential benefits including salary and retirement benefits. The

Sri. R. Prabhakar S/O. Late S. Ramaswamy Vs. Bruhat Bangalore Mahanaga ...

Court: Karnataka

ORDERA.S. Bopanna, J.1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 19.03.2010. The memo reads as hereunder:In view...