En - Judgment Search Results

Sri. En.Unnikrishnan Nair vs the Oriental Insurance Company Limited

Court: Kerala

the matter was taken up on 11.06.2019, thelearned counsel on either side agreed that they would make an endeavour to settle the dispute relating to the quantum of compensation after consulting with their parties. The matter was,

En Veeka Construction Co. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1999(1)ARBLR298(Delhi); 77(1999)DLT155; 1998(47)DRJ726; (1999)121PLR49

respect of claim Nos. 3,4,5, 8,11,12,15 and 16. Preliminary objection is also raised by the respondent that the entire claim of the petitioner was barred by limitation. The said issue was also raised before the arbitrator, who

En Ar En Computers (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2006)(110)ECC565

computers and computer parts. They have purchased computers from the following concerns and sold the same to M/s. En Ar En Computers (P) Ltd. and other customers: The contention is that at the time of visit, there

Union of India and Ors vs En Nk (Dsc) Gabar Singh Negi

Court: Delhi

$~84 to 129* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8850/2024, CM APPL. 35927/2024 NK MARTANDAPPA .....Respondent(85) + W.P.(C) 16269/2024, CM APPL. 68484/2024, CM APPL.HAV DSC VEERAPALLI MUTHU GOUNDER KRISHNAN RETD .....Respondent(86) +...

Mahendrapal Singh Vs. X. En. and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2003(3)WLN638

Prakash Tatia, J.1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent No. 7 Caveator.2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that despite the decree dated 23.5.2002, in favour of the appellant by which the...

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. M/S.En Yes Kay Enterprise ...

Court: Kerala

ADVS.SRI.N.N.SUGUNAPALAN (SR.) SMT.T.N.GIRIJA, SC,EPF ORGANISATION RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT AND RESPONDENTS 1 4 & 6 TO 13.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. M/S.EN YES KAY ENTERPRISES OLD NO. 67, NEW NO 72.AMBEDKAR SALAI, VALASARAVAKKOM, CHENNAI-600087, TAMIL NADU, REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR S.ABDUL HAKKIM.2. PALAKKAD DISTRICT

Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus. Vs. White-en-all Products

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT571Tri(Mum.)bai

under Rule 57A." 2. The phrase "inputs had become waste" refers to the situation whether inputs in their entity are lost. The bottles being broken is the waste which was covered under the sub-rule before and after

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Dee Pee En Corporation

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2007)9STJ40CESTAT(Bang.)alore

1. This revenue appeal arises from OIA No. 15/2006 CE dated 20.1.2006.The Commissioner (Appeals) has noted that the penalty in terms of Section 76 cannot be imposed pertaining to the period prior to its introduction. He...

M Maluru Es En Krishnaiah Setty vs State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.4135 OF 2023 BETWEEN: M.MALURU ES EN KRISHNAIAH SETTY S/O SHIVARAPATNA NARAYANA SETTY OCC: EX-MLA, NOW AGRICULTURIST AND BUSINESSMAN AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT NO.50,

Juggilal Kamlapat Vs. N.V. Internationale Crediet-En-Handels Vereening ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1955Cal65,58CWN731

week of December 1950, but nevertheless the buyers accepted and acted upon it. Meanwhile the export duty was enhanced. On 20-11-1950 the parties agreed that the buyer would accept a Bank guarantee for payment of the increased