Employment - Judgment Search Results

Employers in Relation to the Management of Flaritand Colliery of Bccl ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2002(50)BLJR1351; [2002(94)FLR644]; (2002)IIILLJ175Jhar

the appropriate Government under Sub-section (1) of Section 10, prohibiting employment of contract labour, in any process, operation or other work

Employers in Relation to the Management of Nirsa Area of Eastern Coalf ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2003(2)BLJR1602; [2003(3)JCR189(Jhr)]

of such presumed finding, one can hold the denial of employment to all 683 persons as unjustified.From the last portion of

Employers in Relation to the Management of Bhuli Township Administrati ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2003(3)BLJR2058; [2003(4)JCR34(Jhr)]; (2004)ILLJ554Jhar

Labour Union, reported in (1997) 9 SCC 377, if the employment was of perennial nature, contract system stands abolished and therefore

Workmen of Calcutta Dock Labour Board and anr. Vs. Employers in Relati ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC2251; [1973(26)FLR444]; (1973)IILLJ254SC; (1974)3SCC216; 1973(1)SLJ1044(SC)

object of ensuring greater regularity of employment and regulating the employment of Dock workers in a Port whether registered or not.

Arizona Employers' Liability Cases

Court: US Supreme Court

employee attributable to accidents arising in the course of the employment and due to its inherent conditions, exceeds the bounds of

Employer in Relation to the Management of Central Mine Planning and De ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2003(3)JCR647(Jhr)]

established under Section 5A of the Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 (9 of 1948); (b) any activity relating to

Karnataka Employers Association Vs. The Secretary

Court: Karnataka

of minimum wages in respect of the subject sectors of employment within an outer limit of six months by issuing the

Karnataka Employers Association Vs. The Secretary Labour Department

Court: Karnataka

others who claim that they fall in the category of employments not covered by the Schedule under the said Act of

Employers' Liability Cases

Court: US Supreme Court

the injuries which are suffered in the course of the employment. But such authority in the state is not inconsistent with

Pacific Employers Ins. Co. Vs. Industrial Accident Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

S. 498 September, 1935, in the usual course of his employment, he was sent by his employer to its branch factory