Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: employees state insurance amendment act 2010 section 4 amendment of section 10 Page 97 of about 85,205 results (0.860 seconds)

Tetragon Chemie (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Cce and ors.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1999)(63)ECC709

..... was argued that the term 'include' is to be read in extentio. it was submitted that the apex court in the case of the regional director, employees stale insurance corporation v. highland coffee works in para 7 held as under: the word "include" in the statutory definition is generally used to enlarge the meaning of ..... 55 of 1975 cannot be given to these products because these products are not animal feeds. they are merely animal feed supplements. this exemption notification has been amended by another notification no. 6 of 1984, dated 15th february 1984 as a result of which the item 'animal feed including compound livestock feed' is now ..... the correct classification of the products which consist of only different vitamins in definite proportions and no other ingredients except the solvents or stablizers or antioxidents. stating that such products are generally used as animal feed supplements, the issue was whether these mixtures are classifiable under heading 23.02 as animal feed supplements .....

United India Insurance Company Limited, Tirupati Branch, Tirupati Vs. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : II(2002)ACC326; 2003ACJ191; 2002(3)ALD817; 2002(2)ALT700

..... made use of selecting the multiplier.11. the learned counsel mr. n. subba rao further relied upon a ruling reported in sailada chinathalli and ors. v. oriental insurance company limited, rep. by its branch manager, vizianagaram., : 1994(2)alt500 (db). from the aforesaid judgment, the learned counsel of the respondents herein read out ..... multiplier to assess the compensation?6. the learned counsel mr. n. subba rao appearing on behalf of the respondents herein relied upon a ruling reported in oriental insurance company limited v. hansraj bhai v. kondala and ors., : [2001]2scr999 .7. we have gone through the said ruling and we are of the considered ..... for introducing so many fast-moving vehicles on roads.'13. further, the statement of objects and reasons for amending the act inter alia mentions that the recommendations of the review committee were forwarded to the state governments for comments and they generally agreed with these recommendations. the draft of the proposals based on the .....

Andhra Pradesh State Co-operative Bank Limited Vs. Co-operative Tribun ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD283; 2002(4)ALT580

..... cpc or whether such interest is payable at the contractual rate agreed upon between the parties, fell for consideration of the supreme court in employees insurance corporation v. gujarath state financial corporation, : [1987]3scr607 . the supreme court while declaring that section 34 cpc is not applicable to an order passed under section ..... rules made thereunder, ipso facto apply to the proceedings before the tribunal.31. the 1964 act is a special state enactment consolidating and amending the law relating to co-operative societies in the state. it has received the assent of the president as required under article 254(2) of the constitution. section ..... has been incorporated into the legislation by act 23 of 1965. subsequent amendments have also been made to the provisions contained in this part. suffice it however to note that qua these amendments co-operative societies, as specified by the amendments, including state co-operative banks have been brought within the regulatory framework of the .....

Ram Kumar Vs. Virender Kumar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1986(1)ARBLR341(Delhi); 29(1986)DLT17

..... . velayudhan 1981 ker l. t 2112. the appellant's learned counsel relied on the decision of the supreme court in harcharan v. state of haryana : air1983sc43 . in this case amendment of the grounds of appeal ..... cause for condoning the delay of more than three years. i find support to this view from state of maharashtra v. chabildas jamandas lotawalla prevention of food adulteration cases 1980 (i) 67, v.v. kudva v. employees state insurance corporation, bangalore air 1972 mys 204 basdeo and ors. v. murli dhar singh and ponnamma pillai v ..... cantonment areas. on june 2, 1972 the parliament also enacted act 22 of 1972 amending the cantonments (extension of rent control laws) act 1957 purporting to enable the central government to make the rent control laws in several states applicable to cantonment areas from the dates anterior to the date of notification and .....

P. Thirumurthi Chettiar Vs. State of Madras and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1969Mad91; [1968]21STC489(Mad)

..... limitation prescribed in the rule is ultra vires, illegal and not binding on him. in support of this contention, the learned counsel has cited the decision in solar works v. employees state insurance corporation, : (1963)iillj597mad it was observed by anantanarayanan, j., (as he then was) which observations will be useful for our purpose, and they are to the effect that ..... necessary for him to have paid the tax and then claimed the refund. in the instant case, on the dates when the petitioner filed his applications for refund, this amended section 4-a was not in force and therefore the petitioner was entitled to claim refund without having paid the tax.7. when once i come to the conclusion ..... refund as soon as the tax is levied under the act. the words used in the proviso are 'tax so levied shall be refunded'. but there was a subsequent amendment by act 6 of 1963 and section 4-a was introduced to this effect: 'tax bo levied and collected under section 4 shall be refunded', and the rules were .....

S. Rajagopal Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, Indian Bank,

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2005)IILLJ427Mad

..... dismissed and hence this writ petition.2. the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per the regulations of the indian bank officer employees' (conduct) regulations, 1976, and indian bank officer employees' (discipline & appeal) (amendment) regulation, 1985, regulation 6 provides for procedure for imposing major penalties, and the relevant clause reads as under,'6(4) on ..... disproportionate to the acts of the petitioner. the fact that a suit had been filed to recover the amount does not alter the situation. it is also stated that title deeds have been hypothecated with the bank. therefore, ultimately the entire amount is likely to be recovered. in those circumstances, this court is of ..... purchased. further, this petitioner has acted only in the interest of the bank and in order to increase the volume of business and in fact he has stated that he has increased the volume of the business from rs.2 lakhs to rs.5 crores during his tenure. therefore, may be due to over enthusiasm .....

Punjab National Bank Vs. Surinder Singh Mandyal and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1996HP1

..... balance, if any, towards the principal, as is the usual banking practice. in addition to these amounts, the learned counsel for the plaintiff states that additional amounts spent towards the insurance premium by the plaintiff are also liable to be made recoverable from the defendants.19. from the evidence on record, there is nothing to ..... sum with interest accrued thereon. the committee are of the opinion that interest should not be awarded on interest but only on the principal sum. suitable amendment has accordingly been incorporated in this clause'.the aforesaid observations of the joint committee make it abundantly clear that the intention of the legislature was not to ..... they were not disputing their liability as guarantors, but wanted to take up pleas due to subsequent developments, which had taken place. they were permitted to amend the written statement, wherein they have now taken up a stand that they were asked to sign printed forms of guarantee with blank columns therein. at the .....

M/S. L and T Finance Limited rep. by Its Zonal Legal Manager Vs. M/S. ...

Court : Chennai

..... customers;- disputes between developers/builders and customers;- disputes between landlords and tenants/licensor and licensees;- disputes between insurer and insured;(ii) all cases arising from strained or soured relationships, including - disputes relating to matrimonial causes, maintenance ..... disputes, including-disputes between neighbours (relating to easementary rights, encroachments, nuisance etc.);- disputes between employers and employees;- disputes among members of societies/associations/apartment owners associations;(iv) all cases relating to tortious liability including - ..... thrust given to alternative dispute resolution mechanism under section 89 of the code, by virtue of cpc (amendment) act 46 of 1999, stands diluted in so far as suits for sale, foreclosure or redemption of ..... unenforceable, the respondent would not be liable to pay any money. additionally the respondent has stated that they are entitled to recover damages on account of the applicant charging exorbitant rates of .....

M/s National Insurance Company Limited, Through its Divisional Manager ...

Court : Karnataka Gulbarga

..... ) acc 169 (sc) was distinguished with reference to the date on which the accident had taken place in that case, and the state of the law then prevailing. in the case of national insurance company limited v. vidhyadhar mahariwala and others, (2008)12 scc 701, the controversy was as regards the currency of the licence held ..... are left to their remedy against the owner of the offending vehicle. incidentally, an argument canvassed by the learned counsel for the respondent - claimants that the motor vehicles (amendment) act, 1994, while amending sub-section (2) of section 10, has sought to substitute clause "(e) transport vehicle", for clauses (e) to (h) - ((e) medium goods vehicle, ..... carriage vehicle ". a driver who had a valid licence to drive motor vehicles, therefore, was authorised to drive a light goods vehicle as well. 21. the amendments carried out in the rules having a prospective operation, the licence held by the driver of the vehicle in question cannot be said to be invalid in law." .....

Janhit Abhiyan Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... scheduled tribe, are beneficiaries and that is reason enough to exclude those castes/tribes from the benefit of new resources (created by the state through the amendment) though undisputedly a substantial number of members of these historically marginalised communities and castes also fulfil the eligibility criteria that entitles one as deserving ..... situated with the person or persons who are alleged to have been favoured. article 16(1) does not bar a reasonable classification of employees or reasonable tests for their selection (state of mysore v. v. p. narasing rao (1968) 1 scr407: air1968sc349: (1968) 2 llj120.28. this equality of opportunity ..... overrule decisions of this court, to the effect that when reservations are resorted to in promotions, leading to accelerated promotions, the non-reserved category of employees, upon their promotions should be permitted to retain or catch up their previous seniority].. the court made certain general observations which are relevant, and are .....