Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: employee s compensation act 1923 chapter 1 preliminary Court: rajasthan Page 8 of about 618 results (0.187 seconds)

Tulsi Ram Vs. Upbhokta Sahkari Bhandar

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1978(11)WLN639

..... amount payable under the direction appealed against.it will also be useful to refer to the provisions, of section 30(1) of the, workmen's compensation act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the act of 1923),. which reads as under:section 30. appeals (1) an appeal shall he to the high court from the following orders of the ..... the payment of rs. 1184/- upto october 31, 1968. he, however, maintained the order of the authority in respect of the costs and compensation. against the appellante-judgment, the employee petitioner has filed this revision. it may be stated here that the employer-non-petitioner remained satisfied with the judgment dated december '6, 1973, passed ..... submitted his written statement dated january 6, 1969 the application was resisted, inter alia, on the ground that the petitioner was n )t validly employed as an employee of the non petitioner, that the claim was barred by time and that 'he authority had no jurisdiction to entertain the application. it was also pleaded that .....

Rajendra Kumar Vs. Suman Lata Chaturvedi and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1993ACJ1185; 1993(3)WLC443

..... vehicle is a goods vehicle, a limit of one lakh and fifty thousand rupees in all, including the liabilities, if any, arising under the workmen's compensation act, 1923, in respect of the death of, or bodily injury to, employees (other than the driver), not exceeding six in number, being carried in the vehicle;(b) where the vehicle is a vehicle in which passengers ..... the company and submitted that the accident took place on account of rash and negligent act of the truck driver and not of the taxi driver and the tractor driver was also not responsible for the accident and, therefore, it was not liable to pay compensation and that compensation should be recovered from the owner of the truck, driver or the insurance company ..... s.n. bhargava, j.1. this is an appeal under section 110-d of the motor vehicles act, 1939 (in short 'the act'), against the award dated 21.10.1986 passed by the motor accidents claims tribunal, ajmer, awarding a sum of rs. 2,59,200/- in all and interest thereon.2. as .....

United India Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Smt Choti Devi and ors.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... , 1923) (for short the act) before the learned commissioner. according to the claimants, kailash chand was the husband of respondent no.1, smt. ..... to be paid by the insured employers. reason for this conclusion is obvious. as we have noted earlier the liability to pay compensation under the compensation act gets foisted on the employer provided it is shown that the workman concerned suffered from personal injury, fatal or otherwise, by any ..... compensation commissioner, sikar, whereby the learned commissioner has awarded a compensation of rs.3,36,000/- to the claimants, the appellant-insurance company has approached this court.2. the brief facts of the case are that the claimant-respondent nos.1 to 4 had filed a claim petition under the workman compensation act, 1923 (presently called the employees compensation act .....

National Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Paras and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1994ACJ563

..... goods vehicle, a limit of one lakh and fifty thousand rupees in all, including the liabilities, if any, arising under the workmen's compensation act, 1923 (8 of 1923), in respect of the death of, or bodily injury to, employees (other than the driver), not exceeding six in number, being carried in the vehicle;(b) where the vehicle is a vehicle ..... or bodily injury to, any such employee--(a) engaged in driving the vehicle, or(b) if it is public service vehicle, engaged as a conductor of the vehicle or in ..... arising out of and in the course of his employment, of the employee of a person insured by the policy or in respect of bodily injury sustained by such an employee arising out of and in the course of his employment other than a liability arising under the workmen's compensation act, 1923 (8 of 1923), in respect of the death of, .....

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Abdul Majid and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : II(1994)ACC195; 1995ACJ619

..... limit of fifty thousand rupees in all, including the liabilities, if any, arising under the workmen's compensation act, 1923 (8 of 1923), in respect of the death of, or bodily injury to, employees (other than the driver), not exceeding six in number, being earned in the vehicle;(b) ..... contentions. clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 96 of the motor vehicles act, 1939, enumerated the conditions of policy whose breach exonerated the insurer from the payment of compensation. its sub-clause (ii) ran as under:a condition excluding driving by a named person or ..... accidents claims tribunal, doongarpur, dated 26.8.1985 by which he has awarded compensation to the claimants-respondents as follows:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------s. m.a.c.t. appeal name of deceased/ amount ofno. case no. no. injured compensation----------------------------------------------------------------------------------(1) 62 of 1982 76 of 1986 mohanlal (injured) rs. 6,100/-( .....

Gaindi Devi Vs. Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1992ACJ71

..... dealt with, as such, such provision could be introduced in the act. the learned counsel drew my attention to a provision contained under section 21(2) of the workmen's compensation act, 1923. though it is for the government concerned to make such provision in the act, but necessity of such provision cannot be denied for various reasons.12 ..... it expeditiously.(d) that all the district and sessions judges of the districts in rajasthan be instructed to pay due attention to the matters of compensation under motor vehicles act and particularly pass the interim order to give relief to the victims of the unfortunate accidents and their dependants as per the spirit of the ..... judges, who are heavily burdened with other cases also. according to the learned counsel, the matters of compensation, like the present one, should be given utmost priority to achieve the object contained in the provisions of the act, which is a social legislation. it has been further stated in the petition that the petitioner is .....

Kishan Lal and ors. Vs. Shriram and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1(1986)ACC415

..... out of and in the course of his employment other than a liability arising under the workmen's compensation act, 1923 if such employee is (a) engaged in driving such vehicle or (b) if it is a public service vehicle ..... , and the owner of the truck was not filed an appeal challenging that before this court.7. now coming to the quantum of compensation. the tribunal has held that the amount of expectancy from the income of the claimants was rs. 150/- p.m. nanda at ..... award is inadequate and it must be increased.5. the respondent-insurance company contested this appeal on both the grounds that nanda cannot be compensated by the insurance company because, he was not owner of the cattle taken in the truck. it is significant to note that the insurance ..... the tool box.3. the claimants filed claim petition for rs. 1,35,000/- but the tribunal has allowed rs. 21,600/- as compensation out of which rs. 5,000/- are to be paid by the insurance company the respondent in both the appeals. the finding arrived at .....

Board of Secondary Education Vs. Manohar and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : II(1997)ACC37; 1999ACJ193; 1997(3)WLC434

..... dated 29.4.1992 passed by the commissioner, workmen's compensation, district ajmer (for short 'the commissioner') whereby petition under section 10 of the workmen's compensation act, 1923 (for short 'the act') was allowed and manohar, the claimant-respondent no. 1 was awarded rs. 1,42,074 as compensation. background facts2. the facts of the case lie ..... works ltd., (1950-67) sclj (3) 2022, was a case where the supreme court had occasion to deal with the aspect relating to employer and employee. after referring to certain english decisions, their lordships of the apex court propounded thus:the principle which emerges from these authorities is that the prima facie test ..... not be dependent sometime upon a petty contractor who will not be able to pay compensation on account of financial inability. in our opinion, the main object of enacting section 12 of the act is to secure compensation to the employees who have been engaged through the contractor by the principal employer for its ordinary part .....

L.Rs. of Natwar Lal Vs. Gotam and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2008(1)WLN63

..... has been restricted to statutory liability though liability to indemnify passengers has been limited to statutory liability. so also liability towards employees has been also limited to the extent provided under the workmen's compensation act.24. no exception has been made to restricting liability undertaken by the insurance company to the extent the insured will become ..... the course of such employment.(c) except so far as is necessary to meet the requirements of section 95 of the motor vehicles act, 1939, in relation to liability under the workmen's compensation act, 1923, the company shall not be liable in respect of death of or bodily injury to any person (other than a passenger ..... the course of such employment.(c) except so far as is necessary to meet the requirements of section 95 of the motor vehicles act, 1939, in relation to liability under the workmen's compensation act, 1923, the company shall not be liable in respect of death of or bodily injury to any person (other than a passenger .....

New Indian Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Mst. Baikala and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1994(3)WLC216; 1993WLN(UC)532

..... is a goods vehicle, a limit of fifty thousand rupees in all, including the liabilities, if any, arising under the workmen's compensation act, 1923 (8 of 1923), in respect of the death of, or bodily injury to, employees (other than the driver), not exceeding six in number, being carried in the vehicle;(b) where the vehicle is a vehicle ..... legal representatives filed claim petition, clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 95 of the act was applicable and according to the provisions of sub-clause (4) of clause (b), the tribunal awarded rs. 5,000/- only as compensation. this was confirmed by the kerala high court and hon'ble supreme court maintained it. motor owners insurance ..... appearing b clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 95 of the act and held that if more than one person in injured in the course of the same transaction, each one has met with accident and each is entitled to total compensation limited by the statute from the insurance company. thus the appellant insurance company is .....