Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: employee s compensation act 1923 chapter 1 preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 618 results (0.333 seconds)

Ghanshyam Das Choudhary Vs. Manoj Kumar and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(2)Raj1092

..... injury to, any such employee-(a) engaged in driving the vehicle, or(b) if it is a public service engaged as conductor of the vehicle or in examining tickets on ..... out of and in the course of his employment, of the employee of a person insured by the policy or in respect of bodily injury sustained by such an employee arising out of and in the course of his employment other than a liability arising under the workmen's compensation act, 1923) in respect of the death of, or bodily ..... total disablement/permanent partial disablement and percentage of loss of earning capacity shall be as per schedule i under workmen's compensation act, 1923.17. according to note 5(b), in case of permanent partial disability such percentage of compensation which would have been payable in case of permanent total disability is specified in item (a) above should .....

Kamla Devi and ors. Vs. Rajkiya Coal Depot and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2007ACJ904

..... additional premium. it is not a case of third party accident so far as respondent no. 5 is concerned but under the workmen's compensation act, 1923. moreover, under the provisions of section 3 of workmen's compensation act, 1923 it is only in cases where personal injury is caused by accident which has arisen out of and in the course of ..... india assurance co. ltd., respondent no. 5, would be held liable then liability may be fixed only to the extent of the liability as prescribed under the workmen's compensation act, 1923.4. i have given my anxious consideration on the submission made at the bar. from the perusal of the cover note issued by new india assurance co. ..... ltd., respondent no. 5, in respect of the motor vehicle no. rrl 1387, which was being driven by the deceased as a paid employee for the respondent nos. 4 and 4 (a) which met with an accident involving a truck bearing registration no. rjt 3497 insured with national insurance co. ltd., respondent .....

Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank Ltd. Vs. Prescribed Authority and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1993)IILLJ961Raj

..... we find, however, that there is no conflict. the learned single judge of the rajasthan high court in poonam talkies, dausa v. presiding officer, (labour court, jaipur (s.b. civil writ petition no. 1206/85) decided on 9th june 1986 so. that decision has been upheld by the division bench of the rajasthan high court in the instant ..... can award monetary compensation or both. by virtue of sub-section (5) of section 28a, the order of theauthority has been treated as final. rule-24-b, deals with the procedure which is required to be followed in deciding the complaint filed by an employee under section 28a (2) of the act.19. from the perusal of the provisions contained ..... that the employer must give a notice of dismissal or discharge to the employee. this provision puts a fetter on the right of the employer to dismiss or discharge an employee who has been in continuous employment for a period of six months, without giving one month's notice or wages in lieu thereof and without a reasonable cause. by .....

Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank Ltd. Vs. Prescribed Authority, Under the R ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1992(1)WLC452; 1992(1)WLN500

..... can award monetary compensation or both. by virtue of sub-section [5] of section 28a, the order of the authority has been treated as final. rule-24-b, deals with the procedure which is required to be followed in deciding the complaint filed by an employee under section 28a (2) of the act.20. from the perusal ..... rajasthan shops and commercial establishment act, 1958 cannot be held applicable to such employees. shri pathak placed reliance on the decision of this court in b.n.k. sahkari wholesale upbhokta bhandar ltd. v. prescribed authority under the rajasthan shops and commercial establishment act, 1986 rlr 302.8. s/shri praveen balwada and s.k. kaushik; learned counsel ..... should have effect.13. the same question was again examined in u.p. state electricity board v. h.s. jain air 1979 sc 65. in that case, the question which arose was, as to whether (standing orders) act, 1946, prevail as against regulations regarding the age of superannuation made by the electricity board under the specific .....

M/S Perfect Thread Mills Ltd Vs. Competent Authority Cum Sdo Girwa an ...

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... were, therefore, compulsorily acquired. the question of compensation was taken up under sections 23 and 24 of the land acquisition act, 1894. these sections closely followed the provisions of the land clauses act of 1845 in england before the acquisition of land (assessment of compensation) act of 1919. in laying down the law the ..... always fluctuating but then by applying new horizons giving wide meaning to the term fundamental policy of indian law . and wednesbury's principle of reasonableness ., a fair amount of compensation is required to be awarded to the appellant to satisfy the test of rationality. in totality, to meet the ends of ..... (2003) 4 scc48112. chimanlal hargovinddas vs. special land acquisition officer, poona & anr., (1988) 3 scc75113. state of haryana vs. ram singh, (2001) 6 scc25411 14. m/s. engineers syndicate vs. state of bihar & ors., (2007) 3 scc9915. maharashtra state electricity board vs. sterilite industries (india) & anr., (2001) 8 scc48216. periyar and pareekanni .....

Nikhil Soni Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... up the body for salvation of soul. it is one thing to say that the santhara or sallekhana is not suicide as it is a voluntary act of giving up of one's body for salvation and is not violent in any manner, but it is another thing to say that it is permissible religious practice protected by ..... and the right to freely profess, practice and propagate cannot include the right to take one's life, on the ground that right to life includes the right to end the life. even in extraordinary circumstances, the voluntary act of taking one's life cannot be permitted as the right to practice and profess the religion under article 25 ..... 2005) 8 scc 534), a constitution bench considering the bombay animal preservation (gujarat amendment) act, 1994 restricting the bulls and bullocks below the age of 16 years could not be slaughtered, repelled the challenge on the ground that slaughtering of cows on bakri's is neither essential nor necessarily required as apart of the religious ceremony. an optional religious .....

Shri Shanti Nath Ji Sthan Deh Vs. the State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... on different dates, for practical considerations, such as administrative convenience and facilities for payment of compensation and cannot be held to be discriminatory.11. in paragraph 98 of the judgment in thakur amar singhji & ors. v/s state of rajasthan & ors. (supra), the supreme court dealt with the case of one ..... respondents have supported the judgment of the court below and have also invited our attention to number of entries. rajasthan land reforms and resumption of jagirs act, 1952 defines under section 2(1) khudkast land. khudkast means any land cultivated personally by the jagirdar and includes any land recorded as khudkast. ..... that the trustee/archakas/shebaits/ employees entrusted with the duty of managing and safeguarding the properties of temples, deities and devaswom boards have usurped and misappropriated such proprieties by setting up false claims of ownership or tenancy, or adverse possession in collision with the authorities concerned. such acts of fences eating the crops .....

Ram Karan and Ors Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... on different dates, for practical considerations, such as administrative convenience and facilities for payment of compensation and cannot be held to be discriminatory.11. in paragraph 98 of the judgment in thakur amar singhji & ors. v/s state of rajasthan & ors. (supra), the supreme court dealt with the case of one ..... respondents have supported the judgment of the court below and have also invited our attention to number of entries. rajasthan land reforms and resumption of jagirs act, 1952 defines under section 2(1) khudkast land. khudkast means any land cultivated personally by the jagirdar and includes any land recorded as khudkast. ..... that the trustee/archakas/shebaits/ employees entrusted with the duty of managing and safeguarding the properties of temples, deities and devaswom boards have usurped and misappropriated such proprieties by setting up false claims of ownership or tenancy, or adverse possession in collision with the authorities concerned. such acts of fences eating the crops .....

Kishan Lal and Ors Vs. State of Raj. and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... on different dates, for practical considerations, such as administrative convenience and facilities for payment of compensation and cannot be held to be discriminatory.11. in paragraph 98 of the judgment in thakur amar singhji & ors. v/s state of rajasthan & ors. (supra), the supreme court dealt with the case of one ..... respondents have supported the judgment of the court below and have also invited our attention to number of entries. rajasthan land reforms and resumption of jagirs act, 1952 defines under section 2(1) khudkast land. khudkast means any land cultivated personally by the jagirdar and includes any land recorded as khudkast. ..... that the trustee/archakas/shebaits/ employees entrusted with the duty of managing and safeguarding the properties of temples, deities and devaswom boards have usurped and misappropriated such proprieties by setting up false claims of ownership or tenancy, or adverse possession in collision with the authorities concerned. such acts of fences eating the crops .....

State of Raj. and Anr Vs. Board of Revenue and Ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... on different dates, for practical considerations, such as administrative convenience and facilities for payment of compensation and cannot be held to be discriminatory.11. in paragraph 98 of the judgment in thakur amar singhji & ors. v/s state of rajasthan & ors. (supra), the supreme court dealt with the case of one ..... respondents have supported the judgment of the court below and have also invited our attention to number of entries. rajasthan land reforms and resumption of jagirs act, 1952 defines under section 2(1) khudkast land. khudkast means any land cultivated personally by the jagirdar and includes any land recorded as khudkast. ..... that the trustee/archakas/shebaits/ employees entrusted with the duty of managing and safeguarding the properties of temples, deities and devaswom boards have usurped and misappropriated such proprieties by setting up false claims of ownership or tenancy, or adverse possession in collision with the authorities concerned. such acts of fences eating the crops .....