Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: employee s compensation act 1923 chapter 1 preliminary Page 1 of about 49,838 results (0.278 seconds)

Senior Manager Claims Vs. The Registrar

Court : Karnataka

..... code of civil procedure- 1908 in recovery of amount as initiated by xii additionalsenior civil judge and xxxvii acmm, bengaluru s per annexure-e dated2302.2018 and assumption of power to execute in pursuance to annexure-f are opposed to section31of employees compensation act-1923 and etc. this writ petition, coming on for preliminary hearing in b group, this day, the court made the ..... including motor vehicle policies as contemplated under section 147 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 - 3 - wp no.36618 of 2018 (the 'm.v. act' for short) as also workmen's compensation policy.3. in terms of the act policy issued under section 147 of the m.v. act, the risk of the employee doing certain jobs, while being employed by the employer in the use of .....

Ghanshyam Das Choudhary Vs. Manoj Kumar and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(2)Raj1092

..... injury to, any such employee-(a) engaged in driving the vehicle, or(b) if it is a public service engaged as conductor of the vehicle or in examining tickets on ..... out of and in the course of his employment, of the employee of a person insured by the policy or in respect of bodily injury sustained by such an employee arising out of and in the course of his employment other than a liability arising under the workmen's compensation act, 1923) in respect of the death of, or bodily ..... total disablement/permanent partial disablement and percentage of loss of earning capacity shall be as per schedule i under workmen's compensation act, 1923.17. according to note 5(b), in case of permanent partial disability such percentage of compensation which would have been payable in case of permanent total disability is specified in item (a) above should .....

British India General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sabanna Sabanna and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1967Bom416; (1963)65BOMLR162

..... of argument. all that sub-section 2(a) provides is that the upper limit of the liability arising under the workmen's compensation act, 1923, in respect of the death of, or bodily injury to, employees must be confined to the number of injured persons not exceeding 6. we are not concerned to see what was the number ..... , namely:-(a) where the vehicle is a goods vehicle limits of twenty thousand rupees in all, including the liabilities, if any, arising under the workmen's compensation act, 1923, in respect of the death of, or bodily injury to employees (other than the driver), not exceeding six in number, being carried in the vehicle; (b) . . . (c) . . .' the provisions ..... proviso to section 95 (1) relates to the case of the e employee of the insurer. under the provisions of the workmen's compensation act, 1923,. the employer is liable for compensating the loss arising out of the death or the bodily injury sustained by an employee when that death or injury have arisen out of or in the course .....

British India General Insurance Company, Ltd. Vs. Sabanna and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1969)IILLJ300Bom

..... argument. all that sub-section (2)(a) provides is that the upper limit of the liability arising under the workmen's compensation act, 1923, in respect of the death of, or bodily injury to employees must be confined to the number of injured persons not exceeding six. we are not concerned to see what was the ..... the insured and in respect of whom the insured is under a liability to pay compensation under the workmen's compensation under the workmen's compensation act. the proviso, therefore, lays down that if the risk is to extend to an employee of the insured, then certain conditions laid down therein must be fulfilled. the relevant condition with which ..... : (a) where the vehicle is a goods vehicle, limit of twenty thousand rupees in all, including the liabilities, if any, arising under the workmen's compensation act, 1923, in respect of the death of, or bodily injury to employees (other than the driver), not exceeding six in number, being carried in the vehicle : (b) * * * (c) * * *' 7. .....

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Okram Subhash Chandra Singh and anr.

Court : Guwahati

..... injury to, any such employee(a) engaged in driving the vehicle, or(b) if it is a public service vehicle engaged as a conductor of the vehicle or in examining tickets on ..... death, arising out of and in the course of his employment, of the employee of a person insured by the policy or in respect of bodily injury sustained by such an employee arising out of and in the course of his employment other than a liability arising under the workman's compensation act, 1923 (8 of 1923), in respect of the death of, or bodily .....

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gangavarapur Padmawati and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1996ACJ45

..... , any such employee- (a) engaged in driving the vehicle, or(b) if it is a public service vehicle, engaged as a conductor of the vehicle or in examining tickets on ..... arising out of and in the course of his employment, of the employee of a person insured by the policy or in respect of bodily injury sustained by such an employee, arising out of and in the course of his employment other than a liability arising under the workmen's compensation act, 1923, in respect of the death of, or bodily injury to ..... the hirer are also covered. in our view, also for the same reasons, the insurer is liable to pay compensation if the employee of the owner of the goods travels in the goods vehicle along with his employer's goods for hire or reward and tortious liability of the owner is required to be compulsorily covered by the insurance policy .....

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Rani Rai Bajaj and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1973P& H104

..... where the vehicle is a goods vehicle a limit of twenty thousand rupees in all, including the liabilities, if any, arising under the workmen's compensation act, 1923, in respect of the death of, or bodily injury to employees (other than the driver), not exceeding six in number, being carried in the vehicle; (b) where the vehicle is a vehicle in ..... out of and in the course of his employment (other than a liability arising under the workmen's compensation act, 1923) in respect of the death, of, or bodily injury to, any such employee- (a) engaged in driving the vehicle, or (b) if it is a public service vehicle, engaged as a conductor of the vehicle, or in examining tickets ..... .23. the learned counsel for the appellant then argued that kishori lal was in employee of the owners of the car and he was travelling in the car in the course of employment. he was entitled to recover damages under the workmen's compensation act against the employer. the claim of the heirs which has been allowed by the .....

inder Singh and ors. Vs. Labour Court, Jullundur and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1969P& H310

..... the first point, it is also necessary to notice the provisions of section 20 of the wages act:-'(1) the appropriate government may, by notification by notification in the official gazette, appoint any commissioner for workmen's compensation or any officer of the central government exercising functions as a labour commissioner for any region, ..... was a matter which fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the industrial tribunal, and, therefore, stood excluded from the jurisdiction of the labour court. the employees in that case were employed in the electrical section of mysore sugar company'' factory as shift electricians and as their assistants, they were claiming that for ..... court was right in holding that it had no jurisdiction to entertain an employee's application under section 33c(2) for recovery of the difference in wages actually paid and the wages paid under the madhya pradesh minimum wages fixation act, 1962. with the greatest respect to the learned judges of the madhya pradesh .....

United States Vs. Quality Stores, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... . . . by an employee for an employer. 3121(b). by varying according to a terminated employee s function and seniority, the severance payments at issue confirm the principle that service mea[ns] not only work actually done but the entire employer-employee relationship for which compensation is paid. social security bd. v. nierotko, 327 u. s. 358 366. this broad ..... kennedy delivered the opinion of the court. this case presents the question whether severance pay-ments made to employees terminated against their will are taxable wages under the federal insurance contri-butions act (fica), 26 u. s. c. 3101 et seq. the court of appeals for the sixth circuit held that the payments are ..... insurance varied based on job seniority and time served. quality stores paid and withheld, inter alia, taxes required under the federal insurance contributions act (fica), 26 u. s. c. 3101 et seq. later believing that the payments should not have been taxed as wages under fica, quality stores sought a refund .....

Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank Ltd. Vs. Prescribed Authority and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1993)IILLJ961Raj

..... we find, however, that there is no conflict. the learned single judge of the rajasthan high court in poonam talkies, dausa v. presiding officer, (labour court, jaipur (s.b. civil writ petition no. 1206/85) decided on 9th june 1986 so. that decision has been upheld by the division bench of the rajasthan high court in the instant ..... can award monetary compensation or both. by virtue of sub-section (5) of section 28a, the order of theauthority has been treated as final. rule-24-b, deals with the procedure which is required to be followed in deciding the complaint filed by an employee under section 28a (2) of the act.19. from the perusal of the provisions contained ..... that the employer must give a notice of dismissal or discharge to the employee. this provision puts a fetter on the right of the employer to dismiss or discharge an employee who has been in continuous employment for a period of six months, without giving one month's notice or wages in lieu thereof and without a reasonable cause. by .....