Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: employee s compensation act 1923 chapter 1 preliminary Court: rajasthan Page 12 of about 618 results (0.166 seconds)

LaxminaraIn Misra Vs. Kailash NaraIn Gupta and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1974Raj55; 1973()WLN786

..... the aggrieved persons. section 110-aa relates to the contingency where claim could also be made under the workmen's compensation act. 1923 and i am not concerned with it. section 110 lays down how a claims tribunal will be constituted ..... not a court. 1966 acj 240 (punj) was a case under section 110-f of the motor vehicles act in which it was held that a workmen's compensation commissioner is not a civil court but a mere tribunal.25. in this court a division bench had held ..... breath and i may read this section as well :'110-ccc (1) any court or claims tribunal adjudicating upon any claim for compensation under this act, may in any case where it is satisfied for reasons to be recorded by it in writing that- (i) the policy of ..... in 1964 raj lw 83 that jagir commissioner who decides compensation under section 32 of the land reforms and resumption of jagirs act, 1952 is a .....

The Regional Director E.S.i. Corporation Vs. P.C. Kasliwal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1981WLN460

..... a 'factory' within the meaning of section 2(12) of the act.6. in fills case (supra), the provisions of the workmen's compensation act, 1897 were under consideration, and a view was taken that the, same person cannot be both employer and employee. in esi corporation, jaipur v. goodluck engineering company, ajmer and ors. s.b. civil misc. appeal no. 188/71 decided by me ..... in the case of p.c. kasliwal), he cannot be an employee within the meaning of section 2(9) of the act, for the purpose of contribution, mr. kala has placed reliance on ellis v. joseph elis and co. (1965) (1) kb 324 it was a case under the workmen's compensation act, 1897. a member of a partnership firm for the purpose of working .....

Kalyan Singh Vs. Dhanna Ram and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1977WLN35

..... moved this court under article 226 inter alia alleging that deceased mohanlal was never in his employ and that dhannaram had brought a false claim under the workmen's compensation act and that the workmen's compensation commissioner had allowed the claim of rs. 7000/- against the petitioner without service of notice being effected upon him. it has been contended in the writ petition that ..... of the constitution of india by one kalyansingh wherein he has prayed for quashing the order of the workmen's compensation commissioner jodhpur. the non-petitioner no. 2, dated 30th of april, 1973, & his award dated 30th of november, 1973, under the workmen's compensation act and further prayed to send the case back to the non-petitioner no. 2 to decide it after giving .....

Raman Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2001CriLJ800; 2001(2)WLC632; 2000(3)WLN39

..... in rajiv bhatia vs. govt. of nct of delhi & ors. (67).(55). realising the need of the hour, the parliament has enacted the n.d.p.s. act with a view to eliminate drug addiction and illegal trafficking in drugs by providing stringent punishment for the production, manufacture, possession and sale of drugs and psychotropic substances. section ..... once the special court is constituted under section 36, that court alone would have jurisdiction to try the offences under the n.d.p.s. act, save and except those in relation whereto the sessions court had already taken cognizance. section 36 provides for constitution of special courts and section 36-a(1)(a ..... india & ors. (32), wherein the hon'ble apex court considered the scope of section 36 and has categorically held that after commencement of the n.d.p.s. act, the cases pending before the court of sessions in relation whereto it has not taken cognizance, would have to be transferred to the special court on its constitution and .....

Radhakishan and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1967Raj1

..... the court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the property of wakf was situated a statement containing necessary particulars relating to wakf. the 'court' defined by that act meant the 'court of district judge, or within the limits of original civil jurisdiction of a high court, such court subordinate to the high court as the state ..... therefore, dismissed in limine.'4. the petitioners proceed to say that a certified copy of the above observations was put up before the wakf commissioner alongwith the petitioner's reply and yet he passed an order on 15-12-64 holding that the said building was wakf property, that its alienation was invalid and that it should ..... rs. 7,999 and executed a mortgage-deed on 30-7-1944. at the time of the mortgage, the building was in physical possession of ashan ali khan's tenants. when the mortgage-deed was presented for registration, the sub-registrar invited objections, but since no objection was received, that document was registered by him. ashan ali .....

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Birbal and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(1)Raj573

..... insurance company also filed its written statement wherein it claimed that it had not received any notice under section 10 of the workmen compensation act, 1923 (henceforth to be referred to as 'the act', for short). secondly, that the accident was caused by the thresher, which was not covered by the insurance policy. according ..... dealt with this aspect of the matter and has erroneously concluded that merely because the tractor was comprehensively insured ipso facto the policy covered the other employees. therefore, the commissioner was not justified in directing the insurance company for making the payment.9. we have perused the case of poonam singh ( ..... r.s. chauhan, j.1. the appellant, oriental insurance company, challenges the award dated 30.9.2002 passed by the workmen compensation commissioner, sikar (hereinafter referred to as 'the commissioner', for short) whereby the commissioner has awarded a compensation of rs. 3,42,082/- to the claimant- respondent, birbal.2. in brief, the facts .....

K.P. Misra Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1993)IILLJ1123Raj; 1993(1)WLC692

..... to be decided by 'the eic. sub-clause (a) of section 75 prescribes that a dispute 'whether any person is an employee within the meaning of this act or whether he is liable to pay the employee's contribution', covers the matter raised by the petitioner. apart from this, sub-clause (g) is residuary clause, in which several other ..... the petitioner is doing job, which is ministerial in nature, he is not covered by the definition of term 'employee' as contained in sub-section (9) of section 2 of the employees state insurance act, 1948 (for short, 'esi act'). it is also submitted that respondent no.2 is not a factory as defined in sub-section (12) of ..... counsel for respondent no. 1, has raised, a preliminary objection to the effect that under the provisions of sections 74 and 75 of the esi act, such an objection could be raised and decided by the employees insurance court (for brevity, 'eic'), which is established under the statute. it is, therefore, submitted that this writ petition should be .....

State and ors. Vs. Bilkish Banu and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1(1987)ACC296

..... can be said that the learned claims tribunal mis-directed itself on the question of award of compensation and this court is, therefore, entitled to interfere with quantum of compensation. he has put reliance on a division bench judgment of this court m(s. automobile transport pvt. ltd. v. dewalal, 1976 win 783. the learned division bench ..... project for carrying the employees as such, the state is undoubtedly responsible for the wrong committed by the driver of the vehicle. the state is vicariously responsible for the negligent act of the driver of the vehicle. the accident had taken place, in which shajuddin died. the question, thus, remains about the quantum of compensation. the claims tribunal ..... died on account of his own negligence. shajuddin was travelling in the truck. after leaving the job at mahi dam before the close of the day, shajuddin's duty was up to 4-30 p.m. and without giving any information or seeking any permission from the person concerned, he left the job and travelled in .....

Sanjay Tyagi and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... failure to make an award within the period prescribed therein. it was further held that non-compliance of section 17(3-a), regarding part payment of compensation before taking possession, would also not render the possession illegal and entitle the government to withdraw from acquisition. the aforesaid principle has been reiterated by this ..... supporting private respondents due to their political approach and thereby certain letters were issued to favour the respondents despite acquisition of entire land and deposition of compensation thereupon. this is more so when few non-petitioners had earlier approached this high court to challenge the acquisition with unfavourable result. in a petition filed ..... the state insurance scheme cannot be a public purpose. such an expenditure is not warranted by s.28 of the employees' state insurance act, 1948.the definition of land in cl.(a) of s. 3 of the act will include the super-structure, if any, existing upon it. it was not the requirement of the law to .....

Mehta Printing Industries Vs. Leela Devi

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : II(1989)ACC170

..... 30 of the work-men compensation act, 1923, by m/s. mehta printing industries against the judgment dated may s, 1987 passed by the workmen's compensation commissioner, pali.2. facts in brief are that on november 29, 1984, respondent lila devi filed an application before the workmen commissioner, pali, for grant of compensation on account of the ..... well and died. this was an important document to be taken into consideration by the workmen compensation commissioner. as a matter of fact, the respondent had not adduced any evidence to show that deceased balkishan was an employee directly under the appellant on a monthly salary of rs. 900/-. no appointment letter was ..... facts. however, gyanchand admitted that he bad done pipe work at the factory of the appellant. the version of the appellant with balkishan was an employee of gyanchand bhandari amply finds support from the contemporary document i.e. the first information report. when such important evidence is ignored a substantial question of .....