Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Employable - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial to open GPT-powered briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results — plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 22 2002

Employers in Relation to the Management of Flaritand Colliery of Bccl ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Mar-22-2002

Reported in: 2002(50)BLJR1351; [2002(94)FLR644]; (2002)IIILLJ175Jhar

of M/s. B.C.C.L., P.O. Nawagrah. District Dhanbad in stopping from employment the workmen whose names are given in annexure with effect


Jun 18 2003

Employers in Relation to the Management of Nirsa Area of Eastern Coalf ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jun-18-2003

Reported in: 2003(2)BLJR1602; [2003(3)JCR189(Jhr)]

the action of the Management of Badjna Colliery in denying employment to Basudeo Bhuiyan and 682 others not justified, directed the


Sep 02 2003

Employers in Relation to the Management of Bhuli Township Administrati ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Sep-02-2003

Reported in: 2003(3)BLJR2058; [2003(4)JCR34(Jhr)]; (2004)ILLJ554Jhar

(old)/89/95 (new)'Whether Sh. Chandradeo Prasad Mandal and 65 other persons employed in Bhuli Township for repairing and maintenance of hand pump


Turn these results into brief-ready notes

Apr 30 1973

Workmen of Calcutta Dock Labour Board and anr. Vs. Employers in Relati ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-30-1973

Reported in: AIR1973SC2251; [1973(26)FLR444]; (1973)IILLJ254SC; (1974)3SCC216; 1973(1)SLJ1044(SC)

a body corporate, established under the Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1948 and includes equal number of members representing the


Apr 06 2010

Sri Thammaiah S. S/O Siddaiah, Rtd. Visl Employer Vs. Sri Raju S/O A.K ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Apr-06-2010

ORDERSubhash B. Adi, J.1. The petitioner has celled in question the order dated 2.7.2008 passed in O.S. No. 145/2004 on...


Sep 07 2021

Employers In Relation To The Management Of Bhalgora Area (now Kustore ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-07-2021

JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2021(Arising out of SLP (C) No.29873 OF2016 EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF BHALGORA AREA (NOW KUSTORE


Feb 22 2005

Employers, Mgmt., M. Colliery, Bccl Ltd. Vs. Bihar Colliery Kamgar Uni ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-22-2005

Reported in: AIR2005SC2006; 2005(1)BLJR502; [2005(104)FLR1224]; [2006(2)JCR151(SC)]; JT2005(2)SC444; (2005)ILLJ1135SC; (2005)3SCC331; (2005)2UPLBEC1102

management or disorderly behavior in or near the place of employment, which though not directly causing damage, is conducive to grave


Jan 16 2006

Employers in Relation to the Management of Sudamdih Colliery of Bharat ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-16-2006

Reported in: AIR2006SC946; 2006(2)ALD25(SC); 2006(1)BLJR197; [2006(1)JCR250(SC)]; JT2006(1)SC411; (2006)ILLJ820SC; 2006(1)SCALE284; (2006)2SCC329; 2006(3)SLJ428(SC)

of the management of Sudamdih Colliery of M/s in denying employment to Shri Karma Rout and 21 others with effect from


Feb 01 2008

Employers Management West Bokaro Colliery of Tisco Ltd. Vs. Concerned ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-01-2008

Reported in: AIR2008SC1162; 2008(56)BLJR1286; 2008BusLR359(SC); [2008(116)FLR1108]; [2008(2)JCR5(SC)]; JT2008(2)SC272; (2009)ILLJ220SC; (2008)3MLJ61(SC); RLW2008(3)SC2083; 2008(2)SCALE1; 2008(3)SCC729; 2008-II-LLJ-309; 2008(2)Supreme28

Ashok Bhan, J.1. Leave granted.Management is in appeal.The respondent-workman was working as Senior Dumper Operator under the Management of the...


Dec 17 2004

Employers, Management of Central P and D Inst. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-17-2004

Reported in: AIR2005SC633; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)287; 2005(1)AWC618(SC); 2005(1)BLJR130; (2005)2CALLT89(SC); [2005(104)FLR373]; [2005(1)JCR129(SC)]; JT2005(1)SC148; (2005)ILLJ552SC; (2005)9SC

in the appellant's organisation, the Industrial Tribunal held that the employee had established that she had worked for 240 days continuously


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial