Emperor - Judgment Search Results
Emperor Vs. Narji Bhalji Bhil
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-07-1950
Reported in: AIR1950Bom273; (1950)52BOMLR321
only the offences mentioned in those sections. They cannot try any other offences in a summary manner, See Emperor v. Ganu Sadu 52 Born. 254: A. I. R 1928 Bom. 142 The fact that a Magistrate is
Emperor Vs. Isak Solomon Macmull
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-13-1948
Reported in: (1948)50BOMLR190
years' rigorous imprisonment.5. The Government Pleader, relying on a decision of a divisional bench of this Court in Emperor v. Mahomed Bashir (1945) 48 Bom. L.R. 46, contends that where there is an absolute prohibition and no
Emperor Vs. Bashan Madar Korbu
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-04-1948
Reported in: (1948)50BOMLR290
Matched in: Parties Emperor Vs. Bashan Madar Korbu
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Emperor Vs. Ranchhoddas Narottamdas
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-11-1948
Reported in: (1948)50BOMLR281
Matched in: Parties Emperor Vs. Ranchhoddas Narottamdas
Emperor Vs. Ranchhodlal Hirabhai
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-16-1948
Reported in: (1948)50BOMLR295
is carried out and not defeated. When this question came before my brethren Sen and Jahagirdar JJ. in Emperor v. Dargee Ravjee Chaturbhai (1948) Criminal Appeal No. 431 of 1947 they took the view that looking to
Emperor Vs. Krishnaji Vithal Kangutkar
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-13-1948
Reported in: (1948)50BOMLR293
Matched in: Parties Emperor Vs. Krishnaji Vithal Kangutkar
Emperor Vs. Bhimappa Saibanna Talwar
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-29-1945
Reported in: AIR1945Bom484; (1945)47BOMLR648
Matched in: Parties Emperor Vs. Bhimappa Saibanna Talwar
Emperor Vs. Krishnaji Landge
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-17-1945
Reported in: AIR1945Bom493; (1945)47BOMLR659
a case which can be tried by a Magistrate can be committed to the Sessions. As observed in Emperor v. Bhimaji Venkaji IL.R (1917) Bom. 172 : 20 Bom. L.R. 89, a Magistrate must not determine the
Emperor Vs. Fakirmahomed Currimji Lalji Sajan
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-11-1949
Reported in: AIR1949Bom373; (1949)51BOMLR573
Matched in: Parties Emperor Vs. Fakirmahomed Currimji Lalji Sajan
Emperor Vs. Gajanan Krishna Yalgi
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-09-1945
Reported in: AIR1945Bom533; (1945)47BOMLR669
reason of such associations it was necessary to exercise control over them. Referring to these two cases in Emperor v. Sibnath Banerjee , Zafrulla Khan J. observed (p. 84):Their Lordships held that the question whether there was
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free