From

Emperor - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

Feb 07 1950

Emperor Vs. Narji Bhalji Bhil

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-07-1950

Reported in: AIR1950Bom273; (1950)52BOMLR321

only the offences mentioned in those sections. They cannot try any other offences in a summary manner, See Emperor v. Ganu Sadu 52 Born. 254: A. I. R 1928 Bom. 142 The fact that a Magistrate is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 13 1948

Emperor Vs. Isak Solomon Macmull

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-13-1948

Reported in: (1948)50BOMLR190

years' rigorous imprisonment.5. The Government Pleader, relying on a decision of a divisional bench of this Court in Emperor v. Mahomed Bashir (1945) 48 Bom. L.R. 46, contends that where there is an absolute prohibition and no

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1948

Emperor Vs. Bashan Madar Korbu

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-04-1948

Reported in: (1948)50BOMLR290

Matched in: Parties Emperor Vs. Bashan Madar Korbu

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Feb 21 1944

Emperor Vs. Rayangouda Lingangouda Patil

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-21-1944

Reported in: AIR1944Bom359; (1944)46BOMLR495

Matched in: Parties Emperor Vs. Rayangouda Lingangouda Patil

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 1944

Emperor Vs. Merwan Khodadad

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-02-1944

Reported in: AIR1944Bom318; (1944)46BOMLR488

Matched in: Parties Emperor Vs. Merwan Khodadad

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1948

Emperor Vs. Ranchhoddas Narottamdas

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-11-1948

Reported in: (1948)50BOMLR281

Matched in: Parties Emperor Vs. Ranchhoddas Narottamdas

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1944

Emperor Vs. Hansraj Astaji

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-31-1944

Reported in: (1944)46BOMLR529

Procedure Code cannot be abrogated. I agree with the decision of N. J. Wadia and Weston JJ. in Emperor v. Purshottam Devji (1943) 46 Bom. L.R. 449 that the words ' If the Order so provides '

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 1948

Emperor Vs. Ranchhodlal Hirabhai

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-16-1948

Reported in: (1948)50BOMLR295

is carried out and not defeated. When this question came before my brethren Sen and Jahagirdar JJ. in Emperor v. Dargee Ravjee Chaturbhai (1948) Criminal Appeal No. 431 of 1947 they took the view that looking to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1944

Emperor Vs. Keshavlal Tribhuvandas Panchal

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-24-1944

Reported in: (1944)46BOMLR555

the opinions of the assessors were taken, it came to be noticed that according to the ruling in Emperor v. Janeshar Das (1929) I.L.R. 51 All. 544 this alternative charge was really an additional charge for a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1948