Elementary Education - Judgment Search Results

The District Elementary Educational Officer, Karur District, Karur and ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

orders dated 09.11.2015 came to be passed by the District Elementary Educational Officer, Karur District. 14. A perusal of the first Tamil Nadu Elementary Educational Subordinate Service Rules, the District Elementary Educational Officer is having jurisdictional power and hence, there is nothing

Director of Elementary Education, Vs. Tmt. S. Vigila and Manager, Meer ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2007(2)SLJ380(NULL)

Elementary School as per the said G.O., are extracted hereunder:I. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (Standards I to V):(a) The teacher-pupil ratio of 1:40 earlier norms fixing Teacher-Pupil ratio issued in G.O.Ms. No. 250 Education Department dated 29.2.1964 and Rule 17 and 18 of Madras

Director of Elementary Education and ors. Vs. S. Vigila and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2007(3)JCR450(Mad)]

G.O. Ms. No. 525 dated 29.12.1997, particularly relating to the Elementary School, is not happily worded. It is not very clear is a constitutional mandate that the State should ensure proper education to the students on whom the future of the Society

The District Elementary Educational Officer, Tirunelveli and Others Vs ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

fill-up the post from other scheduled caste candidates. The District Elementary Educational Officer, without taking into consideration of the Statutory Rules the orders, setting aside the orders of the District Elementary Educational Officer concerned. 11. The learned Special Government Pleader, in support

Director of Elementary Education, Odisha Director Vs. Sri Pramod Kumar ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

OF SLP (CIVIL) No.23279 OF2019 (DIARY No.13251 OF2017 DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ODISHA & ORS. VERSUS PRAMOD KUMAR SAHOO .....APPELLANT(S) .....RESPONDENT(S) 22. Furthermore, as noticed hereinbefore, a valid classification based on educational qualification for the purpose of grant of pay has been

Director, Elementary Education and ors. Vs. Pratap Kumar Nayak

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1997(75)FLR662]; JT1997(1)SC458; (1997)ILLJ720SC; (1997)9SCC107; [1997]1SCR21; (1997)1UPLBEC461

a Scheme Sponsored by the Central Government for imparting primary education to the children in the age group of 6 to

S.Arulraj Vs. Director of Elementary Education

Court: Chennai

in accordance with Government orders. So it informed to the Elementary Education Officer to take suitable action accepting the requests of basis of the appeal petition, remarks of the District Elementary Education Officer, Kanchipuram District were obtained in the reference 2 cited.

N.Somu Alias Somaskanthan. Vs. Director of Elementary Education and or ...

Court: Chennai

the Proceedings dated 20.8.2010 in Moo.Mu.No.01441/A3/10 issued by the District Elementary Educational Officer, Thanjavur and consequently, direct the Respondents 1 to of children. Based on the said assurance, the District Elementary Educational Officer, Thanjavur issued a revised notification in Moo.Mu.No.01441/A3/2010 dated 20.08.2010

A.Ramathilagam Vs. Director of Elementary Education

Court: Chennai

District. 3.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Office of the Assistant Elementary Education, Keezavellur, Keezhvellur Union, Nagapattinam District. D.HARIPARANTHAMAN, J.Rkm W.P.No.16782 o30. passed by the first respondent / the Director of Elementary Education, Chennai, in Na.ka.No.9502/D1/2012, dated 27.06.2012, subsequent orders passed by the

Shri M.C. Bora Vs. the Dist. Elementary Education Officer, North Lakhi ...

Court: Guwahati

(b) of Clause (I) of Rule 3 of the Assam Elementary Education (Provincialisation) Rules, 1977 lays down minimum qualification for the thereafter the impugned order was passed by the District Elementary Education Officer, North Lakhimpur. In the said letter, it was stated