Skip to content


Element - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: element Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 1,223 results (0.022 seconds)
May 08 2001 (TRI)

M/S. John Flower India Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: May-08-2001

..... filter blocks of paper pulp fall in heading 48 12 and that many other filtering elements ceramics textiles felts etc are classified according to their constituent material therefore when no material ..... an integral part would entitled classification as machinery parts we find that admittedly the filter elements are first coming into existence thereafter they are placed in the machinery to become an .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 2001 (FN)

Tyler Vs. Cain

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-28-2001

..... does not necessarily alter our understanding of these bedrock procedural elements nor can it be said that all new rules ..... have been held structural in principle teague also adds an element that structural error alone need not encompass namely the requirement ..... has hardly alter ed our understanding of the bedrock procedural elements essential to the fairness of a proceeding internal quotation marks .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 12 2001 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S. Om Glass Works, M/S. Advance

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-12-2001

Reported in: (2001)(76)ECC89

..... fall for classification under ect sub heading 7011 90 as optical elements of glass not optically worked while the assessees contend that the ..... the centring and edging operation this heading applies only to optical elements of which the whole or p art of their surface has ..... notes to heading 70 14 at page 937 states that optical elements of glass not optically worked remain under chapter heading 70 14 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 06 2001 (SC)

Adhyatma Bhattar Alwar Vs. Adhyatma Bhattar Sri Devi

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-06-2001

Reported in: 2001IXAD(SC)403; AIR2002SC88; 2002(1)ALLMR(SC)317; 2002(1)AWC49(SC); 2002(50)BLJR37; I(2002)DMC94SC; [2002(1)JCR220(SC)]; JT2001(9)SC429; 2002(I)OLR1; RLW2002(1)SC122; 2001

..... separation 2 the intention to bring cohabitation permanently to an end animus deserndi 3 the element of permanence which is a prime condition requires that both these essential ingredients should ..... form the necessary intention aforesaid the petitioner for divorce bears the burden of proving those elements in the two spouses respectively and their continuance throughout the statutory period 9 this .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 2001 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S. Magnetix (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Jun-28-2001

..... has allowed the benefit of modvat credit in respect of heating element by following the tribunal s decision in the case of ..... no observation as regards the declaration made it respect of heating element was made by the commissioner appeals the revenue is aggrieved ..... commissioner for deciding the availability of modvat credit on heating elements on the ground of the declaration under the provisions of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 12 2001 (TRI)

Khoday Distilleries Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Decided on: Feb-12-2001

Reported in: (2002)81ITD438(Bang.)

..... of shares by the company to its shareholders did not involve any element of gift because of the fact that the basic ingredients of ..... consideration the learned counsel further went on to argue that even the element of deemed gift under the provisions of section 4 1 a is ..... right shares the question remains to be considered whether there is any element of gift in the allotment of bonus shares it is true .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 14 2001 (HC)

Arya Vysya Srirama Co-operative Society Limited, Shimoga and Others Vs ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-14-2001

Reported in: ILR2001KAR2524

..... question that arises for consideration is whether such a levy has some element of quid pro quo 87 the supreme court in the case ..... the impugned licence fee is regulatory in character therefore stricto sense the element of quid pro quo does not apply in the case the ..... is called a fee or a regulatory fee there should be some element of quid pro quo or reasonablecorrelation between the levy of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 04 2001 (FN)

Pollard Vs. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-04-2001

..... that hudson was wrongly decided because front pay is not an element of compensatory damages but rather a replacement for the remedy ..... first appellate opinions to decide whether front pay is an element of compensatory damages subject to the statutory cap set forth ..... reasons discussed below we conclude that front pay is not an element of compensatory damages within the meaning of 1981a and therefore .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 02 2001 (TRI)

A.L. Thomas Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on: Aug-02-2001

..... under the scheme he shall be permitted the benefit of add on element to the basic pay on a pro rata basis depending on the ..... months under this scheme he shall be permitted the benefit of add on element to basic pay on a pro rata basis depending on the actual ..... period of service under the scheme and that the benefit of add on element to basis pay shall not be admissible for any purpose other than .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 31 2001 (SC)

Charanjit Singh Chadha and ors. Vs. Sudhir Mehra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-31-2001

Reported in: 2001VIIAD(SC)75; AIR2001SC3721; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)291; 2001(3)ARBLR497(SC); II(2007)CPJ41(SC); 2001CriLJ4255; JT2001(7)SC226; 2002MPLJ321(SC); RLW2001(3)SC405; 2001(6)SCALE29;

..... the view that a hire purchase agreement has two elements 1 element of bailment and 2 element of sale in the sense that it contemplates ..... theft as the vital element of dishonest intention is lacking the element of dishonest intention which is an essential element to constitute the offence ..... an eventual sale the element of sale fructifies when the option is exercised by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //