Element - Judgment Search Results

Warner-jenkinson Co. Vs. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... v united states 179 u s 77 83 1900 patentee estopped from excluding a claim element where element was added to overcome objections based on lack of novelty over prior patents sutter ..... of equivalents the determination of equivalence should be applied as an objective inquiry on an element by element basis prosecution history estoppel continues to be available as a defense to infringement but .....

Montana Vs. Egelhoff

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of defendants from effectively disputing guilt through presentation of evidence relevant to that essential element and the evidence is indisputably relevant the montana supreme court held that evidence ..... has effectively restricted itself to advancing undoubtedly sound reasons for defining the mental state element so as to make voluntary intoxication generally irrelevant though its own supreme court .....

United States Vs. Wells

Court: US Supreme Court

..... arguments for affirmance that congress has ratified decisions holding materiality to be a 1014 element by repeatedly amending the statute without rejecting those decisions that the failure of the ..... and 500 that impression could have improperly influenced the jury in passing on the elements of falsity and purpose respondents also suggest that because the indictment alleged materiality any .....

Collector of Customs Vs. Mini Circuits Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1998)(101)ELT376Tri(Chennai)

..... process for example embossing plating up etching or by the film circuit technique conductor elements contacts or other printed components for example inductances resistors capacitors alone or interconnected ..... may be provided with holes or fitted with non printed connecting elements either for mounting mechanical elements or for the connection of electrical components not obtained during the .....

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Sumitan Electro Powers (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1996)(88)ELT453TriDel

..... hand the cost of production arrived at does not include the overhead element gross profit element before deducting the overhead element can be added to the cost of production this in our opinion ..... of profit irrespective of the facts and circumstances of each case and irrespective of the element relating profit and loss in the establishment where such intermediate product is produced the words .....

Mafatlal Industries Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2002(83)ECC85; 1997(89)ELT247(SC); JT1996(11)SC283; 1996(9)SCALE457; (1997)5SCC536; [1996]Supp10SCR585; [1998]111STC467(SC)

..... the taxpayer whether the price of the goods included the duty element also and or also as to whether he has passed on ..... to be sold the divisional court rejected the argument that the tax element in the price should be excluded because it was no price ..... country 141 moreover only the manufacturer has to separately show the duty element in his invoice the wholesaler the distributor or the retailer has .....

Bata India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1996)LC251Tri(Chennai)

..... pleaded that while there could be various arguments in regard to the inclusion of various elements in the wholesale cash price where the appellants are claiming benefit of exemption notification ..... after abatement of excise duty element to come within the limit prescribed in the notification for exemption there should be no .....

Bharat Sales Corpn. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1997)LC300Tri(Delhi)

..... disposed off through this common order the short question falling for decision is whether filter elements claimed to be parts of agglomerators by m s bharat sales corporation are classifiable under ..... such agglomerator would be classifiable under chapter sub heading 8421 29 and therefore these filter elements would merit classification under this sub heading only and not under 8421 23 drawing our .....

Rutledge Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... proof of an actual agreement among the parties the in concert element of the eee offense might be satisfied by something less ..... for us to conclude that despite the identity of the statutory elements congress intended to allow multiple punishments mter all we concluded ..... included offense where the evidence is insufficient to support an element of the greater offense stated in the verdict austin v .....

Collector of Customs Vs. Pragati Computer

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1996)(87)ELT573TriDel

..... circuits may be provided with holes or fitted with non printed connecting elements either for mounting mechanical elements or for the connection of electrical components nor obtained during the printing ..... accepted we have perused the notification it clearly indicates that circuits on which mechanical elements or electrical components have been mounted or connected are not regarded as printed circuits .....