Element - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: element Year: 1978 Page 1 of about 403 results (0.023 seconds)United States Vs. United States Gypsum Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-29-1978
..... antitrust laws footnote 21 page 438 u s 445 several considerations fortify this conclusion the element of intent in the criminal law has traditionally been viewed as a bifurcated concept ..... agreement would have the effect of eliminating the very price concessions which provide the main element of competition in oligopolistic industries and the primary occasion for resort to the meeting competition .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPresnell Vs. Georgia
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-06-1978
..... supported the conclusion that petitioner was guilty of that offense which in turn established the element of bodily harm necessary to make the kidnaping a sufficiently aggravating circumstance to justify the ..... no finding of force statutory rape would therefore be insufficient to provide the bodily injury element associated with the kidnaping which in turn would render that offense insufficient as an .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRegents of Univ. of California Vs. Bakke
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-28-1978
..... and characteristics of which racial or ethnic origin is but a single though important element petitioner s special admissions program focused solely on ethnic diversity would hinder rather ..... purported emphasis on disadvantage it was a minority enrollment program with a secondary disadvantage element white disadvantaged students were never considered under the special program and the university .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Scott
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-14-1978
..... sort devoted to the resolution of factual issues going to the elements of the offense charged would have been required upon reversal ..... sort devoted to the resolution of factual issues going to the elements of the offense charged would have been required upon reversal ..... sort devoted to the resolution of factual issues going to the elements of the offense charged would have been required upon reversal .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTH. Puttappa and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-03-1978
Reported in: AIR1978Kant148; ILR1978KAR605; 1978(1)KarLJ302
..... co operation 9thedition has stated as follows at pages26 to 28 element of compulsion in co operation voluntary association is an important ..... binding on the remaining persons also the introduction of an element of compulsion in co operatives can be justified on some ..... are not willing to associate themselves it is this compulsive element that is involved in section 14 a according tothe petitioners .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-25-1978
Reported in: AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621
..... of treatment the principle of reasonableness which legally as well as philosophically is an essential element of equality or non arbitrariness pervades article 14 like a brooding omnipresence and the procedure ..... narrower and the qualifying adjective has been employed in order to avoid overlapping between those elements or incidents of liberty like freedom of speech or freedom of movement etc already .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSanabria Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-14-1978
..... government responded that violation of the state law is a jurisdictional element of the federal statute and that not every defendant must ..... well but the violation of state law is merely a jurisdictional element which must be satisfied prior to the initiation of federal ..... the district court the violation of state law is a jurisdictional element which need only be proved with respect to the business the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Culbert
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-28-1978
..... proof of racketeering as defined by the copeland committee to require conspiracy were an integral element of the substantive offenses footnote 7 there is nothing in the legislative history to dispel ..... intend to make criminal liability under the hobbs act turn on proof of some additional element of racketeering one congressman in enumerating for his colleagues exactly what the government would have .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. LaSalle Nat'l Bank
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-19-1978
..... inevitable because congress has created a law enforcement system in which criminal and civil elements are inherently intertwined when an investigation examines the possibility of criminal misconduct it ..... the conclusion that congress intended to design a system with interrelated criminal and civil elements section 7602 derives assertedly without change in meaning footnote 13 from corresponding and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNixon Vs. Warner Communications, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-18-1978
..... 435 u s 590 preservation act whose existence is a decisive element in the proper exercise of discretion with respect to release ..... arguments reviewed above there is in this case an additional unique element that was neither advanced by the parties nor given appropriate consideration ..... the existence of the act is as we hold a decisive element in the proper exercise of discretion with respect to release .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial