Electorate - Judgment Search Results

Chief Electoral Office & Anr. Vs.mahalakshmi Light

Court: Delhi

218/2017 and I.A. No.5351-52/2017 ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent $~OS-28 * % + Through Ms.Iram Majid, Adv. versus CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICE & ANR. MAHALAKSHMI LIGHT Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. These objections

The Chief Electoral Officer vs Irshad Alam

Court: Kerala

1471 OF 2022 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12046/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANT/1ST RESPONDENT: THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER, ELECTION DEPARTMENT, KERALA LEGISLATIVE COMPLEX, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695

The Chief Electoral Officer, vs Bruhat Bengaluru Hotels Association,

Court: Karnataka

AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT WRIT APPEAL NO. 282 OF 2024 (EXCISE) BETWEEN:1. THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER, SESHADRI ROAD, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001.2. THE ELECTION OFFICER, BENGALURU TEACHER CONSTITUENCY AND REGIONAL COMMISSIONER,

Chief Electoral Officer Vs. Jagmato Devi and ors.

Court: Patna

J.N. Bhatt, C.J.1. This group of two Letters Patent Appeals under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent of the Patna High Court arise out of an order and judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 3.1.2006...

Chief Electoral Officer Vs. Sunny Joseph

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2005(4)KLT599

Supreme Court as its Chairperson and the allegation raised against the Commission is totally baseless. Fourth respondent, Chief Electoral Officer and Secretary to Government therefore filed LA. No 10110 of 2005 to recall the order dated 5.7.2005

Elector Diesel (P.) Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1975]36STC589(Mad)

V. Ramaswami, J.1. These four revision petitions relate to the assessment years 1961-62 to 1963-64. In respect of the last assessment year, there are two assessment orders and two revision cases, because of the change in...

Chief Electoral Officer, Haryana Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Reported in: (1999)68ITD439(Chd.)

of tax was much more than the amount of TDS.2. The brief facts are that the assessee, Chief Electoral Officer, Haryana, Chandigarh, made payments for preparation and supply of photo identity cards. The payments were made to

The Australian Electoral Commission and Others Vs. David Johnston and ...

Court: Australia High Court

margin leads me to conclude that it is prudent to confirm the result in the interests of the electorate's confidence in the outcome". Ballot papers reserved for the decision of the AEO 45. During the re-count, 949

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. The Chief Electoral Officer

Court: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4769 OF2022NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. …APPELLANT Versus THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER & ORS. …RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The non-application of the general strict liability principle, in

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Hindustan Elector Graphites Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2000]109TAXMAN342(SC); [2000]243ITR48SC

1. The question of law which falls for consideration is :Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer under Section...