Election Commissioner - Judgment Search Results
State Election Commissioner, Bihar Patna Vs. Janakdhari Prasad .
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-03-2018
1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1463 OF2008State Election Commissioner, Bihar Patna & others …Appellant(s) Janakdhari Prasad and others Versus …Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, CJI Janakdhari Prasad, the … the aforesaid reasoning, he set aside the order of the Commission.5. Aggrieved by the aforesaid view, the State Election Commissioner filed an appeal, being L.P.A No.879 of 2004, before a Division Bench of the High Court, which concurred
The Chief Election Commissioner Of India Vs. M.r. Vijayabhaskar
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-06-2021
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.1767 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.6731 of 2021) The Chief Election Commissioner of India ....Appellant Versus M.R Vijayabhaskar & Ors. ....Respondents 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J This judgment … and tele media. 8 On 27 April 2021, an individual filed a complaint, against Mr Sudip Jain, Deputy Election Commissioner and other officials of the EC under Sections 269, 270 and 304 read with Section 120-B of the
Chief Election Commissioner Etc. Vs. Jan Chaukidar (Peoples Watch) and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3040-3041 OF 200.The Chief Election Commissioner Etc. … Petitioners Versus Jan Chaukidar (Peoples Watch) & Ors. … Respondents ORDER These are appeals by way
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Chief Election Commissioner Vs. Sat Pal and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-05-1993
Reported in: 1993(2)SCALE993; 1994Supp(1)SCC150
226 of Constitution of India - by election of legislative assembly came to be interdicted by Order of Election Commissioner on certain grounds - Order challenged and Division Bench of High Court made ex parte Order - appeal
Election Commissioner of India Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-10-1993
Reported in: 1993(4)SCALE524; 1995Supp(3)SCC643
views.2. This order disposes of that part of I.A. No. 2 which pertains to the controversy between the Election Commissioner on the one hand and Governments of States and the Union of India on the other in, regard
State Election Commissioner Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Apr-06-2001
applications, and passed the aforesaid directions. Being aggrieved by the order of the learned single Judge, the State Election Commissioner has filed these appeals.5. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that in view of the legal bar … of, all elections to the Panchayats shall be vested in the State Election Commission consisting of a State Election Commissioner to be appointed by the Governor. Article 243O creates a bar to interference by Courts in electoral matters.
The State Election Commissioner Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Apr-06-2001
applications, and passed the aforesaid directions. Being aggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge, the State Election Commissioner has filed these appeals.5. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that in view of the legal bar … of, all elections to the Panchayats shall be vested in the State Election Commission consisting of a State Election Commissioner to be appointed by the Governor. Article 243O creates a bar to interference by Courts in electoral matters.
The Chief Election Commissioner of India Vs. Yanamala Ramakrishnudu, M ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-19-1994
Reported in: 1995(1)ALT28
Matched in: Parties The Chief Election Commissioner of India Vs. Yanamala Ramakrishnudu, Mla, Telugu Desam and ors.
The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission of India Vs. Dr. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-04-1994
Reported in: 1994(3)ALT653
the lives of several innocent people. With regard to the role of the first respondent viz., the Chief Election Commissioner, it is stated in paragraph (8) as follows:'The first respondent though very famous for his prompt action, is … armed security officers have been provided to the candidates round the clock. It is stated that the Chief Election Commissioner has appointed 20 observers who are highly placed Government Officials to cover these four districts and all these
Ajit Singh Vs. Chief Election Commissioner of India and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-26-1989
Reported in: AIR1989SC2255; [1989(59)FLR713]; JT1989(3)SC746; 1989LabIC2085; 1989(2)SCALE671; (1989)4SCC704; [1989]Supp1SCR249; 1990(1)LC276(SC); (1990)1UPLBEC169
1970. On January 4, 1974 he was further promoted to the post of Private Secretary to the Deputy Election Commissioner in which capacity he worked till July 26, 1977 when the Deputy Election Commissioner under whom he was … Secretary to the Deputy Election Commissioner in which capacity he worked till July 26, 1977 when the Deputy Election Commissioner under whom he was working relinquished charge of office.2. The first respondent is the Chief Election Commissioner. One
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free