Election Commission - Judgment Search Results

State Election Commission Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(3)ALD456

passed in the Budget Session of the Parliament and if elections to these bodies are held now, several legal and practical five years from the date appointed by the State Election Commissioner for the first meeting of the Mandal Parishad or Zilla

State Election Commission, Bhopal Vs. Ras Bihari Raghuwanshi and ors., ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1995MP245; 1996(0)MPLJ966

by the State Election Commission, make available to the State Election Commission such staff as may be necessary for the discharge accept the contention of the respondents, it would convert the Commission into an absolute despot in the field of election so

State Election Commission Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2008(2)JCR100(Jhr)]

respect to all matters relating to, or in connection with elections to the Panchayats.8. From bare reading of the aforesaid constitutional a State shall, when so requested by the State Election Commission, made available to the State Election Commission such staff as

Election Commission of India Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1984SC1406; 1984Supp(1)SCC104; [1984]3SCR554; 1984(16)LC955(SC)

fact is established that the Chief Secretary and the Chief Election Officer of Haryana, had personally apprised the Chief Election Commissioner that has been stated by the learned Counsel for the Commission is that everything was considered (without even disclosing the content

Election Commission of India and Another Vs. Dr. Subramanian Swamy and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996IIIAD(SC)750; AIR1996SC1810; JT1996(4)SC463; (1996)2MLJ65(SC); 1996(3)SCALE734; (1996)4SCC104; [1996]Supp1SCR637

the person, be he the Chief Election Commissioner or an Election Commissioner, against whom the charge of bias is established ought they do not speak of exclusion of the Chief Election Commissioner from the decision-making process. These provisions merely set out the

Election Commission of IndiA. Vs. Telengana Rastra Samiti and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

filling the vacancy", that, Section does not say that "the Election Commission shall hold a bye-election "forthwith" or "immediately"" and that could result in an impossible situation. On behalf of the Commission it was also submitted that the provisions of Sections 150

Election Commission of India vs.mukhtar Ansari & Anr

Court: Delhi

machines and whether it would affect a free and fair election. The fact that the Election Commission has itself decided to the applicant/accused Mokhtar Ansari. Learned Senior Counsel for the Election Commission submits that the the security of Election Commission is bestowed

Election Commission of India Vs. Bajrang Bahadur Singh and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Allahabad passed an interim order on 20.3.2015 - staying the election process to the above-mentioned constituency.5. Aggrieved by the said interim to lodge account of election expenses - If the Election Commission is satisfied that a person - (a) has failed to

Election Commission of India Vs. Shivaji and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC61; JT1987(4)SC298; 1987(2)SCALE996; (1988)1SCC277; [1988]1SCR878

try an election petition shall be the High Court. An election petition has to be presented in accordance with Section 81 No. 26, Osmanabad-Latur-Beed Local Authority Constituency, Osmanabad, that the Election Commission had on 15-10-1987 already postponed the date of poll from

Babu Vs. Election Commission of India

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR2006Ker226; 2006(2)KLT135

of the party in power.According to the counsel for the Election Commission, the pay revision will amount to financial grant in Conduct, the decision to implement the recommendations of the Pay Commission was taken before the announcement of election schedule and hence