Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Ea - Judgment Search Results

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 15 2017

Ed @ Ea vs.aka

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-15-2017

COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 197/2017, C.M. No.41048/2017, C.M. No.41049/2017 and C.M. No.41050/2017 ED @ EA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arvind Singh, Advocate along with Mr. S.K. Gautam, Mr. Vipin Raghav and Mr. Anuj


Apr 08 2024

Amal Ea vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Apr-08-2024

THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN CC NO.3036 OF 2020 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,CHAVAKKAD PETITIONER/3RD ACCUSED: AMAL EA AGED 24 YEARS S/O AROMAL, RESIDING AT EACHARAN HOUSE, VADANAPALLY PO, CHAVAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 680614 BY ADVS.


Jul 21 2023

Ea Aboobacker vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-21-2023

FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JULY 2023 / 30TH ASHADHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 19307 OF 2023 PETITIONERS: 1 EA ABOOBACKER AGED 79 YEARS ELAVAKKAT HOUSE, KAKKANAD WEST P.O, VAZHAKKALA JUNCTION, KOCHI - 682030. 2 NIZAMUDDIN EA AGED


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 19 2026

Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co Ltd Vs Mahshook EA

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-19-2026

Vi ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032. represented by its Authorised Signatory .... Applicant Vs. Mr.Mahshook EA S/o.Abdu Rahman .... RespondentArbitration Application under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules r/w Section 9 (1)


Sep 27 2017

M/S Xegent Consultants Pvt Ltd vs.ea Water Pvt Ltd & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-27-2017

CS(COMM) 973/2016 M/S XEGENT CONSULTANTS PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Yakesh Anand with Mr.Nimit versus Mathur, Advocates. EA WATER PVT LTD & ORS Through : None being ex parte. ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH


Mar 10 2015

Mahendra Prasad and Anr Vs. Union of India Rep. by G.M. Ea

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Mar-10-2015

Nagar, Chas, PO and PS Chas, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand ....Appellants Versus Union of India, represented by General Manager, Eastern Railway, 17, Netaji Subhas Road, PO & PS Hare Street, Kolkata ...Respondent -------- Coram: THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE


Feb 23 2024

The Corporate Manager, Marthoma & Ea Schools Corporate Management vs S ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-23-2024

OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 4TH PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 7205 OF 2024 PETITIONER: THE CORPORATE MANAGER, MARTHOMA & EA SCHOOLS CORPORATE MANAGEMENT SCS CAMPUS, THIRUVALLA-689101. (LALYKUTTY P., W/O JAMES THOMAS, POOKKATTUSSERI HOUSE, KARAMOODE PO, KOLLAM-., PIN -


Oct 25 1989

Gopika Ranjan Choudhary, General Secretary of Union of Assam Rifles No ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-25-1989

Reported in: JT1989(4)SC173a

Head for conducting mainly the administrative work of the Force. The Force which was controlled by the North Eastern Frontier Agency (NEFA) had 25 Battalions/Units and each Battalion consisting of about 1400 personnel which also included some


Oct 25 1989

Gopika Ranjan Choudhary, General Secretary of Union of Assam Refles No ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-25-1989

Reported in: AIR1990SC1212; JT1989(4)SC173; 1989(2)SCALE898; 1989Supp(2)SCC616; [1989]Supp1SCR727

Head for conducting mainly the administrative work of the Force. The Force which was controlled by the North Eastern Frontier Agency (NEFA) had 25 Battalions/Units and each Battalion consisting of about 1400 personnel which also included some


Nov 05 1943

V. Subramania Ayyar Son of Vaidhyanatha Aiyer on Behalf of and in the ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-05-1943

Reported in: AIR1944Mad256

the father-in-law died and the control of the firm passed to his sons and eventually to his grandson each of those persons as proprietor of the firm received its assets including this particular deposit under the same


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial