Dye - Judgment Search Results
Dye Vs. Hofbauer
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-11-2005
Dye v. Hofbauer - 04-8384 (2005) Dye v. Hofbauer - 04-8384 (2005) PER CURIAM DYE V. HOFBAUER 546 U.
Dye Vs. New Jersey.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1972
DYE v. NEW JERSEY. - 409 U.S. 1090 (1972) U.S. Supreme Court DYE v. NEW JERSEY. , 409 U.S.
Crary Vs. Dye
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-24-1908
Crary v. Dye - 208 U.S. 515 (1908) U.S. Supreme Court Crary v. Dye, 208 U.S. 515 (1908) Crary v. Dye
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Marshall Vs. Dye
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-01-1913
Marshall v. Dye - 231 U.S. 250 (1913) U.S. Supreme Court Marshall v. Dye, 231 U.S. 250 (1913) Marshall v. Dye
Hoechst Dyes and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. K.N. Anantharama Ayyar, Commr. of ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-04-1984
Reported in: (1985)46CTR(Bom)173; [1985]151ITR713(Bom)
company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and carry on the business of manufacturing various petrochemical products and dyes. The petitioners also carry on trading activities. For the assessment year 1972-73, the petitioners were assessed on a
Petlad Turkey Red Dye Works Co. Ltd. Vs. Dyes and Chemical Workers' Un ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-03-1960
Reported in: AIR1960SC1006; (1960)ILLJ548SC; [1960]2SCR906
Das Gupta, J.1. The only point raised in this appeal by the employer, Petlad Turkey Red Dye Works Ltd., Petlad, against the award of an Industrial Tribunal of a sum of Rs. 9,839 equivalent to
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Empire Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-11-1991
Reported in: (1991)96CTR(Bom)108; [1991]192ITR245(Bom)
T.D. Sugla, J.1. In this reference both at the instance of the Department and the assessee relating to the assessee's assessment for the assessment year 1973-74, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred to this court the...
S.G. Chemicals and Dyes Trading Employees' Union Vs. S.G. Chemicals an ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-03-1986
Reported in: [1986(52)FLR661]; 1986LabIC863; (1986)ILLJ490SC; 1986(1)SCALE1048; (1986)2SCC624; [1986]2SCR126; 1986(3)SLJ29(SC)
will hereinafter be referred to in short as 'the Maharashtra Act'.2. The First Respondent Company, S.G. Chemicals and Dyes Trading Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the Company') is a wholly owned subsidiary of Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Limited
Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. Bombay Environmental Acti ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-11-2005
Reported in: 2005(6)BomCR565; (2006)4CompLJ1(SC); JT2005(11)SC366; (2005)5SCC61; 2005(2)LC974(SC)
financial institutions to pay of the dues of the workers and also the dues of the others.(ii) Bombay Dyeing & . alone after taking advances from the financial institutions paid Rs. 120 crores to the workers and
Lajya Dyeing and Bleaching Works Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-02-2003
Reported in: (2003)185CTR(SC)329; 2003(90)ECC430; 2003(155)ELT213(SC); [2003]263ITR763(SC); (2003)5SCC485
to the personal hearing which you attended before me on June 22, 1995, in the case of Lajya Dyeing and Bleaching Works during the course of which you had requested for details of demand notice issued so
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free