Duty - Judgment Search Results

Flemingo Duty-free Shop Pvt. Ltd. and Mr. Vivek S. Bhatt Vs. Union of ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(4)ALLMR663; (2008)110BOMLR1730

that the fact that ITDC were the incumbent operators of duty free shops at the Mumbai Airport and the fact that

Flemingo Duty Free Shops Pvt. Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the P ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2009KAR3462; 2009(5)KarLJ480

- since they would have crossed it before entering the Duty-free shop. Hence, the goods brought by the petitioner from abroad,

Hyderabad Duty Free Retail Limited Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court: Delhi

being not meant for domestic sale but for sale in Duty Free shops, cannot be treated as imported into India; and,

Flemingo Duty Free Shop Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

have, a sales turnover from the said business of operating Duty-Free business in India or overseas equivalent of at least INR

Duti Debi Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: (1977)IILLJ110Ori

inviting those officers who had been wrongfully superannuated to resume duty. Even before that date and soon after the decision of

M. Ct. Muthiah and anr. Vs. Controller of Estate Duty, Madras

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1986SC1863; (1986)58CTR(SC)164; [1986]161ITR768(SC); 1986(2)SCALE54; 1986Supp(1)SCC375; [1986]3SCR315

1968. The question which arose in the course of estate duty proceedings on his death was whether an amount of Rs.

Controller of Estate Duty, Gujarat Vs. Kantilal Trikamlal

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1976SC1935a; [1976]105ITR92(SC)

that as between the Gift Tax Act and the Estate Duty Act there is basic difference in that the tax effect

Controller of Estate Duty Vs. P.S. Narasimhan and Another

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1993]200ITR422(Mad)

the affirmative and in favour of the Controller of Estate Duty. The parties are directed to bear their own costs in

M.M. Muthiah Vs. Controller of Estate Duty

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1999]236ITR166(Mad)

dated August 31, 1978, under the provisions of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). The following

Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Harbans Singh Overruled in Pritam Singh ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [1975]98ITR331(P& H)

this court for opinion under section 64(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, hereinafter called the Act.'Whether, on the facts and