Duplicity - Judgment Search Results

Indian Duplicator Co. Ltd. Vs. Addl. Collector, Central Excise and ors ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1988(19)LC333(Calcutta)

the main ingredient or r&w; material for the manufacture of duplicating stencil paper...that stencil paper clearly falls within item 17(2) of

Indian Duplicators Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1984]57STC263(Mad)

mark 'Government of Andhra Pradesh 1972-73' was found on the duplicating ink tubes would not necessarily lead to the conclusion that

Heyer Vs. Duplicator Manufacturing Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Heyer v. Duplicator Manufacturing Co. - 263 U.S. 100 (1923) U.S. Supreme Court

Gestetner Duplicators Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, West B ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC607; (1979)8CTR(SC)371; [1979(38)FLR315]; [1979]117ITR1(SC); (1979)2SCC354; [1979]2SCR788

and carries on the business of manufacture and sale of duplicating machines and accessories. It has in its regular employment three

Associated Duplicator Co. P. Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. Karnataka Elect ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [2004]120CompCas351(Kar); ILR2004KAR1517; 2004(7)KarLJ29; [2004]52SCL325(Kar)

liquidator in-charge of the winding up proceedings of M/s. Associated Duplicator Company (P.) Ltd., which was ordered to be wound up

Shourie Duplicators Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Employees State Insurance C ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 45(1991)DLT333; [1991(63)FLR873]; (1992)IILLJ443Del

Y.K. Sabharwal, J. (1) The short question to be determined in this appeal filed by the management is whether payments...

Supreme Duplicators Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(113)ELT138TriDel

1.1 The appellant herein is a manufacturer of stamp pads and stamp pad ink. Besides using the brand name of...

Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Indian Duplicator Co. Ltd.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1988]69STC238(Ker)

paper and duplicating paper cannot be taxed as accessories to duplicating machines. However, duplicating paper is paper and after amendment it

State of Orissa Vs. Gestetner Duplicators (P.) Ltd.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 40(1974)CLT437; [1974]33STC333(Orissa)

under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947?The assessee deals in duplicating machines, duplicating paper and stencil paper, etc. The dispute is

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gestetner Duplicators Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1977]110ITR46(Cal)

limited company. The company is a manufacturer and seller of duplicating machines and accessories. It had different categories of salesmen in