Duplicity - Judgment Search Results
Gestetner Duplicators Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, West B ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-14-1978
Reported in: AIR1979SC607; (1979)8CTR(SC)371; [1979(38)FLR315]; [1979]117ITR1(SC); (1979)2SCC354; [1979]2SCR788
2. The assessee is a private limited company and carries on the business of manufacture and sale of duplicating machines and accessories. It has in its regular employment three categories of salesmen-machine salesmen, mixed salesmen and supply
Associated Duplicator Co. P. Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. Karnataka Elect ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-30-2004
Reported in: [2004]120CompCas351(Kar); ILR2004KAR1517; 2004(7)KarLJ29; [2004]52SCL325(Kar)
D.V. Shylendra Kumar J.1. The official liquidator in-charge of the winding up proceedings of M/s. Associated Duplicator Company (P.) Ltd., which was ordered to be wound up as per an order passed by this court
Shourie Duplicators Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Employees State Insurance C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-20-1991
Reported in: 45(1991)DLT333; [1991(63)FLR873]; (1992)IILLJ443Del
Y.K. Sabharwal, J. (1) The short question to be determined in this appeal filed by the management is whether payments made by the management to its employees under Production Bonus Scheme falls within the definition of...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Indian Duplicator Co. Ltd. Vs. Addl. Collector, Central Excise and ors ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-20-1988
Reported in: 1988(19)LC333(Calcutta)
should not be recovered for manufacture of coated paper at the intermediate stage prior to the manufacture of duplicating stencils.4. By a letter dated 23.12.1977 the petitioner pointed out that coated paper was never cleared by the
Indian Duplicators Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-23-1984
Reported in: [1984]57STC263(Mad)
Ratnam, J. 1. The appellant, who is a manufacturer and dealer at Madras with branches outside in duplicators, its accessories and duplicating ink, etc., reported a total and taxable turnover of Rs. 6,08,344.91 and Rs. 5,70,056.30
Supreme Duplicators Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-27-1999
Reported in: (1999)(113)ELT138TriDel
1.1 The appellant herein is a manufacturer of stamp pads and stamp pad ink. Besides using the brand name of its own i.e. 'Supreme' on the said goods it is also using the brand name of...
Heyer Vs. Duplicator Manufacturing Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-12-1923
Heyer v. Duplicator Manufacturing Co. - 263 U.S. 100 (1923) U.S. Supreme Court Heyer v. Duplicator Manufacturing Co., 263 U.S. 100
Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Indian Duplicator Co. Ltd.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-09-1987
Reported in: [1988]69STC238(Ker)
Act. We are concerned with the assessment year 1980-81. The controversy is regarding the rate at which the duplicating paper and stencil paper are taxable. The Revenue brought these two items to tax as coming within item
Copy-max Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Scor. Duplicators Company (P) Ltd.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-27-1992
Reported in: 1992(1)WLN315
Milap Chandra Jain, J.1. This is a petition under Section 439 read with Section 433(e) and (f), Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the non-petitioner Company.2. The petitioner's case is that it sold one plain...
State of Orissa Vs. Gestetner Duplicators (P.) Ltd.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-15-1974
Reported in: 40(1974)CLT437; [1974]33STC333(Orissa)
paper should be taxed at 5 per cent under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947?The assessee deals in duplicating machines, duplicating paper and stencil paper, etc. The dispute is as to whether stencil paper is paper as
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free