Dumbness - Judgment Search Results
MUNIYAPILLLAI (Deaf and Dumb) Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-15-2026
JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 15-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND WMP NO. 24558 OF 2026 MUNIYAPILLLAI (Deaf and Dumb) S/o.Arumugam, Represent by his son, Ganesh, M/A.21 Years, S/o.Muniyapillai, new colony (west street), Arur village and post, sankarapuram
Biju(Deaf and Dumb) vs K.Anbarasu
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-16-2021
1942 AGAINST THE AWARD IN OPMV 1186/2000 DATED 27-07-2005 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,ATTINGAL APPELLANT/S: BIJU(DEAF AND DUMB) REP.BY HIS SISTER AMIKA,D/O.VASUMATHY,, PARAYIL VILAKOM VEEDU, CHELANTHIYAMKONAM,, ALIYADU(P.O)VENJARANMOODU,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST BY ADVS. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SHRI.PRATHAP PILLAI SRI.RAJAN VELLOTH
Fr.Agostino Vicinis Special School for the Deaf and Dumb vs State of K ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-05-2021
/ 13TH ASWINA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 20651 OF 2021 PETITIONER/S: FR.AGOSTINO VICINIS SPECIAL SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF AND DUMB MUNDAMVELI, KOCHI 682 507, THROUGH ITS MANAGER, SR. JANCY KATTIPARAMBIL BY ADVS. JOSE ABRAHAM E.ADITHYAN PHILIP.N.JOSEPH RESPONDENTS :
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Vs. All India Deaf and Dumb Society
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2005
Reported in: (2005)198CTR(Del)376; [2006]283ITR113(Delhi)
in cash and again repaying the same in cash, as the Society runs a school for deaf and dumb children/persons. All the expenses are met from the donations or grants received from the government as well as
Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Vs. All India Deaf and Dumb Society
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2005
Reported in: (2006)198CTR(Del)376
in cash and again repaying the same in cash, as the society runs a school for deaf and dumb children/persons. All the expenses are met from the donations or grants received from the Government as well as
Mr. Rajiv Kumar (Deaf and Dumb) Vs. Kewal Cargo Carriers (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2006
Reported in: AIR2007Delhi27; 2006(90)DRJ222
facts of Suit No. 819/2001 out of which RFA No. 291/2004 has arisen. The plaintiff, a deaf and dumb person, filed a suit through his next friend for recovery of Rs. 4,83,852/- under the provisions of Order
The State of Gujarat Vs. One Deaf and Dumb Man
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-20-1967
Reported in: 1969CriLJ328
to R. R. Hospital at Limdi. The Medical Officer certified that the accused appeared to be deaf and dumb. The learned Judicial Magistrate relied upon that certificate and found that the accused was deaf and dumb. The
Rajinder Kumar Vs. All India Deaf and Dumb Society
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-1996
A.P. Chowdhri, President: 1. All India Deaf and Dumb Society (Regd.), arrayed as opposite party in this complaint, appears to have been running a weekly prize lottery
Emperor Vs. a Deaf and Dumb Accused
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-31-1916
Reported in: (1916)ILR40Bom598
Batchelor, J.1. In this case the accused, a deaf and dumb man, has been convicted of theft under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code, and the proceedings have
Emperor Vs. a Deaf and Dumb
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-31-1916
Reported in: AIR1917Bom288; 37Ind.Cas.495
1. In this case the accused, a deaf and dumb man, has been convicted of theft under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code, and the proceedings have
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free