Drum - Judgment Search Results
United States Vs. Drum
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-15-1962
United States v. Drum - 368 U.S. 370 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Drum, 368 U.S. 370 (1962) United States
Asnew Drums Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. Maharashtra State Finance Corpor ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-24-1971
Reported in: AIR1972SC801; (1971)3SCC602; [1972]1SCR351; 1971(III)LC834(SC)
to appreciate these points it is necessary to set out a few facts. One of the appellants, Asnew Drums Private Ltd., hereinafter referred to as the appellant company, made an application to the Bombay (now Maharashtra) State
East India Drums and Barrels Manufacturing Ltd vs Development Commissi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16457/2024, CM APPLs.69454/2024, 73853-55/2024 & EAST INDIA DRUMS AND BARRELS MANUFACTURING LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindwani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anuj Agarwala, Mr. Prakash Jha,
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Natarajan @ Drums Natarajan vs the State Rep by, the Station House Off ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-05-2025
MADRASDATED : 05.03.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.RC.No.160 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.Nos.1272 and 1275 of 2025 Natarajan @ Drums Natarajan ... Petitioner Vs. State rep. by the Station House Officer Odiansalai Police Station through Public Prosecutor, Puducherry
Drums Food International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Euro Ice Cream and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-01-2011
1. The Notice of Motion is heard finally. 2. The plaintiff has sought a declaration that a cease and desist notice issued by the defendants is an unjustified and groundless threat and that the use of...
Jetha Drum Containers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. S.R. Chanawala and ors. and Sultan ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-30-1985
Reported in: 1986(2)BomCR139
and other benefits to the erstwhile employees of the petitioner.2. The petitioner was in the business of manufacturing drums and containers, and, the respondents were working in the clerical section of its establishment. On November 27, 1981,
Standard Drum and Barrel Mfg. Co. Vs. Regional Director, E.S.i. Corp.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-19-1984
Reported in: 1985(2)BomCR190; (1984)86BOMLR673
C.S. Dharmadhikari, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the Standard Drum and Barrels Manufacturing Co. Bombay against the order passed by the Employees Insurance Court at Bombay in application
Standard Drum and Barrel Manufacturing Company, Bombay Vs. Its Workmen ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-02-1960
Reported in: (1961)ILLJ130Bom
There is no dispute that it has 19 permanent workmen. The business of the company is to manufacture drums and barrels. It has entered into a five-year agreement (confidential Ex. C. 1) with the Standard-Vacuum Refining Company
Pearson Drums and Barrels (P) Ltd. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Feb-12-2002
Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC130
1. After dispensing with the condition of pre-deposit of duties and penalties involved in both the appeals. I take up the appeals together inasmuch as the issue is already covered in favour of the appellants by...
Standard Drums and Barrel, L. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-14-2005
Reported in: (2005)(183)ELT72Tri(Mum.)bai
DROMS to Public sector Petroleum Refinery M/s.HPCL and are situated adjacent is the premises of M/s. HPCL. The Drums are fabricated from steel sheets supplied by M/s. HPCL; purchase order prescribe the delivery of Drums as per
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free