Drinking - Judgment Search Results
Pure Drinks (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. (Asstt. Ci ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-03-1993
Reported in: (1994)49TTJ(Del)225
Estate, Bombay measuring 17,907. 6 sq. mts. In part of this plot, it had its factory, where soft drinks were manufactured and on the other part, it had residential flats for its employees. The assessed-company approached the
Pepsi Foods Vs. Jai Drinks (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-1996
Reported in: 1996(36)DRJ711
been filed by 'PEPSI' for declaration, injection and rendition of accounts. Suit No.2110/92 has been filed by Jai Drinks Private Limited (In short referred to as 'JAI') against Pepsi Foods Limited for declaration and for recovery of
Kreem Drinks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-22-2014
CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE22D DAY OF MAY20141ST JYAISHTA, 1936 WP(C).No. 12858 of 2014 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER : -------------------------- KREEM DRINKS PVT. LTD, CHEMICAL INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, AROOR, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER REENA.K. BY ADVS.SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER SRI.ARUN KUMAR.P RESPONDENT(S):
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Royal Drink Xpurt vs Ms Central Secretariat Club
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-25-2026
decision: 25.02.2026 + ARB.P. 112/2026 & I.A. 1125/2026 (Delay of 138 days in Re- filing the petition) ROYAL DRINK XPURT .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Pragya Choudhary, Advocate and Mr. Nikhil Anand, AdvocatesversusMS CENTRAL SECRETARIAT CLUB .....Respondent Through: Appearance
Bangalore Soft Drinks Pvt Ltd vs the Bangalore Development Authority
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-10-2025
DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.11022 OF 2025 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN:1. BANGALORE SOFT DRINKS PVT. LTD.,A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.114, OPP. VIDYANIKETAN SCHOOL
The Thiruvananthapuram Drinking Water Distribution vs State of Kerala,
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-27-2020
2JUDGMENTTanker Lorry Owners Association has preferred the writ petition against the draft bye laws 2019 regarding distribution of drinking water. Petitioner Association has already filed a representation- Ext.P3 dated 20.01.2020, pointing out the objections. But they may
Ab Soft Drinks, vs State Bank of India,
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-27-2019
RAMACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2019 / 6TH ASHADHA, 1941 WP(C).No.13918 of 2019 PETITIONER: AB SOFT DRINKS, MUTHUPARABU,CHIRAVALLIKKAD, THACHANKADU POST, REPRESENTED BY THE PROPRIETRIX, ZEENATH, W/O.HUSSAIN ABBAS, MUTHUPARABU, CHIRAVALLIKKAD, THACHANKADU POST, SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K. SRI.JOPHY
Fizz Drinks Limited Vs. the Labour Court (2) and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-17-2004
Reported in: [2005(104)FLR1196]; (2005)1UPLBEC595
of Accountant on salary of Rs. 1,000/- per month on temporary basis at petitioner's Company, namely, M/s. Fizz Drinks Ltd., Faridabad and was deputed to work at Meerut in the Sales Department of the Company. The salary
Fizz Drinks P. Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-15-2001
Reported in: [2001]123STC183(P& H)
G.S. Singhvi, J.1. In this petition, the petitioner has prayed that the orders, annexures P1 and P3, passed by the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner (1)-cum-Revisional Authority, Faridabad (East) (respondent No. 3) and the Sales Tax...
Pure Drinks Limited and ors. Vs. Project Investments Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-07-2005
Reported in: 2006(86)DRJ482
Mrs. Surinder, Judge is the daughter of late Sardar Mohan Singh, who was the founder of the Pure Drinks Group. Mr. Parag Tripathi, learned senior counsel, states that there are two orders passed by this Court on
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free