Dressing - Judgment Search Results

Novelty Dresses and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2006(3)JCR288(Jhr)]

1992 before the special Court stating therein that the petitioner No. 1 was the registered firm M/s. Novelty Dresses and the other petitioners were the partners of the said firm having equal share in profit and loss

Novelty Dress Manufacturing Company Vs. Karnataka Appellate Tribunal a ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1998]109STC14(Kar)

ORDERG.C. Bharuka, J.1. These two revision petitions filed under section 23(1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (in short 'the Act'), are directed against the common order dated January 5, 1996 passed by the Tribunal...

Fine Surgical Dressing Manufacturing Co. Vs. the State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1997)116PLR398

Matched in: Parties Fine Surgical Dressing Manufacturing Co. Vs. the State of Punjab

Kalpana Dresses Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1978)80BOMLR359; 1977MhLJ151

the order of summary dismissal of First Appeal No. 638 of 1975, is whether the appellant M/s Kalpana Dresses, are a factory, within the meaning of Employees' State Insurance Act.2. On a careful consideration of the evidence

Virendra Dresses Vs. Varindra Garments

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1982Delhi482; 21(1982)DLT472; 1982RLR538

Sultan Singh, J.(1) Virendra Dresses, plaintiff/appellants challenge the judgment and order dt. 21-7-1981 of the Additional District Judge, Delhi refusing to issue a

Rainbow Surgical Dressing Mfg. Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1980)2GLR632

Matched in: Parties Rainbow Surgical Dressing Mfg. Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Whiteway Dresses Vs. Addl. Labour Court and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1978)IILLJ345Mad

Ramanujam, J.1. The petitioner herein is a partnership concern engaged in the manufacture and sale of readymade garments at No. 9, Memorial Hall Street, Madras-3. The second respondent herein along with 7 others filed Claim Petition...

Sri Kittappa Dress Manufacturing and Embroidery Works Vs. the State of ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1962]13STC34(Mad)

is the sole proprietor of a business at Madurai run in the name and style of Sri Kittappa Dress Manufacturing and Embroidery Works. He is a 'dealer' in textiles, within the charging provisions of the Madras General

Sri Kittappa Dress Manufacturing and Embroidery Works by Proprietor R. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1962)2MLJ1

the sole proprietor of a business at Madura to run in the name and style of Sri Kittappa Dress Manufacturing and Embroidery Works. He is a ' dealer' in textiles, within the charging provisions of the Madras

Goyal Dresses and Another Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai and Anot ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Per Jyoti Balasundaram In this case, M/s.Goyal Dresses filed declaration under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme in 1998. The Commissioner rejected the claim of the company