Draw - Judgment Search Results

Engineering Drawing Services Association Irrigation Department Vs. Sta ...

Court: Uttaranchal

Reported in: 2005(3)AWC2435; [2005(105)FLR462]

Department do not deserve the pay scale which is being drawn by Draftsmen (Mechanical) in the same Department. Rather, the Government

The Drawing and Disbursing Vs. the Acit (Tds)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Reported in: (2008)116TTJ(All.)952

1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the CIT(A)'s order dated 28.5.2007 for the assessment year 2003-04.The...

Allahabad Wire Drawing Industries Private Limited and anr. Vs. Uttar P ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2004]138STC164(All)

M. Katju, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for a mandamus directing the respondents to refund the entire amount...

Drawings and Metals and ors. Vs. State Bank of India

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1992)2CALLT289(HC),96CWN978

Samir Kumar Mookherjee, J.1. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging Order No. 40,...

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Indian Drawing and Equipment

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(113)ELT454TriDel

were also involved in the appeal filed by M/s. Indian Drawing & Equipment Industries before the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals)

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Roorkee Drawing Emporium

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1982]49STC153(All)

carrying on business of manufacture and sale of survey and drawing instruments sold goods worth Rs. 10,000 to the Executive Engineer,

Terai Overseas Ltd. Vs. O.S. Draw Back Deptt.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1997(96)ELT250(Cal)

of the petitioner is that the petitioner's claim for receiving drawback under the Customs & Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 1995,

Terai Overseas Ltd. Vs. the O.S., Draw Back Deptt. and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1998(59)ECC252

in place of ready made garments in order to claim drawback. The investigation has still not been completed. 5. Mr. Ghosh,

“that the Petitioner Was Drawing Vs. Yog Raj, Executive Engineer

Court: Punjab and Haryana

of the aforesaid reply reads thus:- That the petitioner was drawing Rs.434/- per month since 10.02.1993 till date. However, after deducting

M/S. M.S.Wire Drawing and Wire Nail Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Kerala State Pol ...

Court: Kerala

13378 of 2013 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- 1. M/S. M.S.WIRE DRAWING AND WIRE NAIL PVT. LTD. MEKKONE, KOTTAMKARA, CHANDANATHOPPE P.O. KOLLAM-14.