Dowry - Judgment Search Results

In Re: Enforcement and Implementation of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC2375; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)570; 2005(2)BLJR1285; 2005(5)BomCR198; 2005CriLJ2598; 119(2005)DLT452(SC); I(2005)DMC805SC; [2005(3)JCR170(SC)]; JT2005(5)SC71; (2005)4SCC565

subject of barter, acceptance of the woman as a wife depending on what her parents would pay as dowry, varying with the qualification and the status of the bridegroom's family. As felicitously put by Krishnaswami Aiyar, C.J.

In Re: Eandi of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: I(1999)DMC15SC; JT1998(6)SC412; (1998)5SCC570

9(2)(b) of the Act; and (b) Steps taken, if any, to create awareness regarding the provisions of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and the Dowry Prohibition (Maintenance of Lists and Presents to the Bride and Bridegroom) Rules,

In Re: E and I of Dowry Prohibition Act, 61 Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC3610b; JT1999(10)SC358; 1999(7)SCALE149

below is only a summarized version of the order pronouncedRules have not been framed under Section 10 of Dowry Prohibition Act by States. Supreme Court directed State Governments where rules have not been framed to file affidavit

Shivappa @ Shivamani S/O. Basappa Soppin, Vs. the State of Karnataka b ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2007KAR4222; 2008(3)KarLJ199;

been convicted for the offences punishable Under Section 498-A, 302 r/w. 34 of IPC., and Section-4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act r/w 34 of IPC, and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of

State of Karnataka by Police Inspector Anti-dowry Cell, Cod Vs. Modins ...

Court: Karnataka

Sections 498-A, 304-B read with Section 34 of the IPC and Sections 3, 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.2. The prosecution case in brief is as follows:Deceased Rajbi was married to the first respondent Mohidinsab

“The Petitioner Has Allegedly Demanded Dowry and Committed Vs. State ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court:- “The petitioner has allegedly demanded dowry and committed cruelty. The petitioner is the husband of the complainant. It is brought to the notice of

State by C.O.D. Police, Anti Dowry Cell, Bangalore Vs. K. Sridhar

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2000CriLJ328; I(2000)DMC320; 2000(1)KarLJ274

of the evidence which clearly indicates that there was a demand for money which was effectively the unpaid dowry amount and that this was the reason for the unhappiness that emanated in the mind of the deceased