Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Door - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 23 2016

Door Deco Industries vs.customs, Central Excise & Service Tax

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-23-2016

Judgment delivered on:23. 11.2016 + (5) + (6) + (8) + (9) + W.P.(C) 8712/2016, CM APPL. 35749/2016 DOOR DECO INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX..... Respondent Through:


Nov 23 2016

Saswat Door Devices vs.commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax Sett ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-23-2016

Judgment delivered on:23. 11.2016 + (5) + (6) + (8) + (9) + W.P.(C) 8712/2016, CM APPL. 35749/2016 DOOR DECO INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyanka Goel, Adv. Versus CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX..... Respondent Through:


May 14 2026

Door Devices Manufacturing Company vs Principal Chief Commissioner of ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-14-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 12103/2022 CM APPL. 38919/2023 DOOR DEVICES MANUFACTURING COMPANY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Pankhuri Shrivastava & Mr. Mukul, Advs.versusPRINCIPAL


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 16 2024

Gulshan Medicare Door No.41/2015 vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-16-2024

16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 26TH POUSHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 37995 OF 2015 PETITIONER/S: 1 GULSHAN MEDICARE DOOR NO.41/2015 AMULIA STREET,KOCHI-18,REPRESENTED BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR PRATHEEP KUMAR,S/O.PARAMESWARAN,AGED 40 YEARS. 2 DR.T.P.PAULOSE AGED 71 YEARS S/O.T.P.PAUL,MEDICAL DIRECTOR,GULSHA MEDICARE,DOOR


Feb 11 2026

Pavan Doors and Windows India Pvt Ltd Vs The Joint Director General of ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-11-2026

AT MADRASDATED: 11.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Pavan Doors and Windows India Pvt Ltd Rep by its Director Teachers Colony, Erode - 608011. Appellant(s) Vs Respondent(s) PRAYER:


Mar 02 2026

M/s. DOOR PALACE Vs The State Tax officer

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-02-2026

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.8206 & 8207 of 2026 M/s. Door Palace, Represented by its Proprietor Ahamedkabeer Abdulkadar, No.119, Poonamallee High Road, Nerkundram, Chennai - 600 107. ...Petitioner Vs.


Oct 11 2004

Northern Doors (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-11-2004

Reported in: 2005(182)ELT450(All)

the petitioner submitted that the Tribunal has misread the orders placed by the State Government for supplying of doors and it was nowhere mentioned that the petitioner has to supply flush doors. He further submitted that the


Aug 10 2006

Door Sanchar Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Shri R.K. Bara ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-10-2006

Reported in: 2006(3)ARBLR491(Delhi)

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Door Sanchar Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. awarded work of construction of 120 dwelling units to the respondent. In


Feb 25 2005

Door Sanchar Vibhag Through Its Chief General Manager Doorsanchar and ...

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Feb-25-2005

Reported in: AIR2005Raj206; RLW2005(2)Raj1012; 2005(2)WLC535

Matched in: Parties Door Sanchar Vibhag Through Its Chief General Manager Doorsanchar and ors. Vs. Chaturbhuj


Feb 10 1992

Sudershan Doors Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Feb-10-1992

Reported in: 1992(43)LC112(Allahabad)

Anshuman Singh, J.1. We have heared learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the Union of India. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that though...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial