Dominion - Judgment Search Results
Dominion of India Vs. the Delhi Registered Stock Holders (iron and Ste ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-08-1958
Reported in: AIR1958P& H270
view which has since been confirmed by a Full Bench of this Court in Babu Lal v. The Dominion of India, 54 Pun LR 398: (AIR 1953 Punj 184) (A).7. It is, however, contended on behalf of
The Dominion of India and anr. Vs. Shrinbai A. Irani and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-14-1954
Reported in: AIR1954SC596; [1955]1SCR206
contended that after August, 1947, the user of the property was not by the appropriate Government, viz., the Dominion of India, but was by the State Government. She also contended that the requisitioning order had ceased to
The Dominion of India and ors. Vs. Premchand Siremal and Co.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-02-1958
Reported in: AIR1959Kant43; AIR1959Mys43; ILR1958KAR245; (1958)36MysLJ455
be decided. That is the true test. This question came up for consideration in the case reported in Dominion of India v. Eversharp Agency, (S) AIR 1955 Bom 98. In that case also a parcel containing Eversharp
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dominion of India Vs. Mathura Prasad
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-10-1957
Reported in: AIR1958All148
Matched in: Parties Dominion of India Vs. Mathura Prasad
Dominion of India Vs. Purshottam Das Brijnandan Prasad
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-02-1959
Reported in: AIR1961All176
The notice in question is Ex. A-1 dated 8-8-1948. It was addressed to the Governor-General in Council, Indian Dominion, New Delhi and the General Manager, O. T. Railway, Gorakhpur. Reference was given at the top of the
The Dominion of India, Ministry of Railway, New Delhi and ors. Vs. Amr ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-31-1961
Reported in: AIR1963All134
of September, 1947. The looting was done in connection with the disturbances that followed the creation of two dominions in the country. The defendants therefore pleaded that the loss of the consignment was dueto reasons beyond their
Dominion of India Vs. Central Aerating Gas Company
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-16-1962
Reported in: AIR1964All243
Matched in: Parties Dominion of India Vs. Central Aerating Gas Company
Dominion of India Vs. L. Badu Lal
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-12-1960
Reported in: AIR1962All461
recovery of a sum of Rs. 24,060 against the Union of India (the suit originally was against the Dominion of India but later the necessary amendment appears to have been made) relating to a railway administration. The
Dominion of India Vs. Kaniz Fatma and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-17-1961
Reported in: (1961)IILLJ197All
Matched in: Parties Dominion of India Vs. Kaniz Fatma and anr.
Dominion of India Vs. Eversharp Agency
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-24-1954
Reported in: AIR1955Bom98a; (1954)56BOMLR532
pens and pencils which were consigned by railway from Bombay to Lahore. The damages are sought from the Dominion of India representing the Railway authority.The facts briefly are that on 24-2-1948, the plaintiffs, a firm carrying on
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free