Dominion - Judgment Search Results

Dominion of India Vs. the Delhi Registered Stock Holders (iron and Ste ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1958P& H270

..... since been confirmed by a full bench of this court in babu lal v the dominion of india 54 pun lr 398 air 1953 punj 184 a 7 it is however .....

Chaman Lal Loona and Co. Vs. Dominion of India, New Delhi

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1954P& H129

..... liability for payment under the contract was exclusively that of the dominion of pakistan on this ground he dismissed the petition and ..... the military farm lanore is situated within the territory of the dominion of pakistan and the geographical location of the place where ..... had the power of allocating these stores among the two dominions and for transferring them from one place to another therefore .....

The Owners and Partners of the Firm Named Shah Kantilal Vs. Dominion o ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1954Cal67

..... day the absorbing province shall be deemed to be substituted in those proceedings for the dominion and the proceedings shall continue accordingly article 9 provides any proceedings which if this order ..... united kingdom of judgments obtained in a superior court of any part of the british dominions including any territory which is under the british protection or mandate its provisions are somewhat .....

E.B.M. Company, Ltd. Vs. Dominion Bank

Court: Privy Council

..... in connexion with certain land which they had purchased in dominion square montreal taking as security among other securities a hypothecation ..... of any final judgment that may be obtained by the dominion government against the undersigned company in respect to the action ..... upon the following grounds that under its letters patent and dominion companies act the company had power to join with the .....

The King Vs. Dominion Engineering Co., Ltd.

Court: Privy Council

..... led to the present claim was entered into between the dominion company and the lake sulphite pulp company limited hereinafter called ..... a contract was concluded between these two companies whereby the dominion company undertook to manufacture for and supply to the pulp ..... of possession of the apparatus should not pass from the dominion company to the pulp company until all the stipulated payments .....

Trilock Chand Agarwalla Vs. Dominion of India (Now as the Union of Ind ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1959Cal281

..... plaintiff instituted the suit on the 11th november 1948 as a commercial cause against the dominion of india describing it as the successor of the former central government which owned the ..... said portion from bogra to siliguri railway stations was exclusively for the purposes of the dominion of pakistan and as such the contract under the indian independence rights properties and liabilities .....

Mohammed AmIn Bros. Ltd. Vs. Dominion of India and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1952Cal323,54CWN514

..... rhodesia ltd 1917 2 ch 115 16 learned counsel for the dominion has advanced arguments which if accepted would make it difficult for ..... company on the ground of certain assessments for taxes if the dominion had obtained decrees in the ordinary civil courts against the ..... into the judgments or decrees passed against the company but the dominion contends that having regard to section 226 govt of india act .....

Chhangamal Harpaldas and anr. Vs. Dominion of India and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1957Bom276; (1957)59BOMLR704; ILR1957Bom647

..... special suit no 12 of 1950 dismissing their suit against the dominion of india 2 the facts which give rise to the claim ..... 5 the plaintiffs served notice upon the railway administration and the dominion of india claiming rs 10 061 12 as compensation for damage ..... compensation claimed by them 6 the suit was resisted by the dominion of india contending inter alia that the plaintiffs could not maintain .....

Anath Bandhu Deb Vs. Dominion of India

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1955Cal626

..... said that the contract here is for the exclusive purposes of the dominion of pakistan within the meaning of that clause 20 now the actual ..... to consider this contract to be exclusively for the purpose of the dominion of pakistan the situs of the movables the bricks is not for ..... that in that event it will be a joint liability of the dominions of india and pakistan in that case the proper forum to decide .....

D.D. Jaishi Ram Co. Vs. Dominion of India

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1953P& H83

..... and say that the packages were in good condition 17 gupta j in dominion of india v guruprosad ram gupta air 1949 cal 679 held that ..... b was discussed in a case to which i have already referred dominion of india v guruprosad ram gupta air 1949 cal 679 and it ..... of much assistance to the plaintiffs appellants 30 janeshwar lal rajeshwar lal v dominion of india air 1951 punj 383 again was a case of risk .....