Dom - Judgment Search Results

Fatik Dom and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

(Bagdehari) P.S. Case No. 65 of 1993) ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ 1. Fatik Dom 2. Dilbahadur @ Dilu Dom @ Dilip @ Dil Bahar

Santosh Dom Vs. the State of Bihar

Court: Patna

JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.891 of 2012 ====================================================== Santosh Dom .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... ....

Baleshwar Dom Vs. the State of Bihar

Court: Patna

JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2590 of 2012 ====================================================== Baleshwar Dom, Son of Late Shankar Dom, Resident of Village Mahuli, P.S.

Kanai Dom Alias Kanhai Dom and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3183 o”1. Kanai Dom @ Kanhai Dom 2. Mithun Dom 3. Sagar Dom ...

Deendayal Badgaiyan (Dom) Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

W.P.No.14425/2013 [Deendayal Badgaiyan (Dom) .Vs..State of M.P.& ors.].29-08-2013 Heard Shri R.P.Kanojiya, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of...

Pradeep Dom Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 4234 of 2013 Pradeep Dom ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. …

Dom Fernandez Vs. V.M. Shevade and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(2)MhLj281

D.G. Deshpande, J. 1. Heard learned counsel Mr. Menon for the petitioner and learned APP for the State/respondent No. 2....

Sanjay Dom Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2003(4)JCR715(Jhr)]

ORDERS.K. Mukhopadhaya, J.1. Heard the counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner has challenged the order contained in letter No. 659...

M/S. Dom Francisco Flat Owners Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. Vs. M/S. Al ...

Court: Mumbai Goa

1. The only point which arises in this appeal for consideration is:- Whether the plaint can be rejected under Order...

Lalua Dom and ors. Vs. the State

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1955Cal461,1955CriLJ1174

in the dacoity.6. The first appellant before us is Lalu Dom (Lalua Dom). The evidence against this accused consists of his