Doctrinal - Judgment Search Results

Welch Vs. Texas Dept. of Highways

Court: US Supreme Court

..... difficult if not impossible to rationalize it is patently improper to extend the eleventh amendment doctrine of sovereign immunity any further footnote 2 10 ii the eleventh amendment does not bar ..... rested on a conception of state sovereignty that justified the incorporation of the sovereign immunity doctrine through the state common law but only in diversity suits his opinion traditionally has been .....

United States Vs. Johnson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and the lower federal courts have consistently applied the feres doctrine since its inception and have never suggested that the military ..... and death benefits is an independent reason why the feres doctrine bars suit for service related injuries footnote 10 in feres ..... 2 we have identified three factors that underlie the feres doctrine first the relationship between the government and members of its .....

Arizona Vs. Hicks

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for entering the apartment that lack of relationship always exists when the plain view doctrine applies in saying that a warrantless search must be strictly circumscribed by the exigencies ..... and there is no reason in theory or practicality why application of the plain view doctrine would supplant that requirement although the interest protected by the fourth amendment injunction against .....

United States Vs. Stanley

Court: US Supreme Court

..... even against civilian federal officials thus the court concludes the concerns underlying the feres doctrine preclude stanley s bivens action for service connected injury against civilian federal officials ..... and punished because chappell involved the relationship at the heart of the feres doctrine the relationship between soldier and superior the court found feres considerations relevant and .....

Utah Div. of State Lands Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... states had title to the lakebed under the equal footing doctrine under that doctrine the united states holds the lands under navigable waters ..... utah s claim to the lakebed under the equal footing doctrine upon entry into statehood the 1888 act s structure and ..... be created and in dicta even suggested that the equal footing doctrine absolutely prohibited the united states from taking any steps to .....

Edwards Vs. Aguillard

Court: US Supreme Court

..... humankind footnote 11 the term creation science was defined as embracing this particular religious doctrine by those responsible for the passage of the creationism act senator keith s leading ..... scientific establishment appellees insist it is not science at all but thinly veiled religious doctrine both interpretations of the intended meaning of that phrase find considerable support in the .....

Pennzoil Vs. Texaco, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... several interdependent considerations first the court acknowledges that today s extension of the younger doctrine applies only when certain civil proceedings are pending if the state s interests ..... private disputes by abandoning this critical limitation the court cuts the younger doctrine adrift from its original doctrinal moorings which dealt with the states interest in enforcing their criminal laws .....

Nlrb Vs. Ibew

Court: US Supreme Court

..... meaning of 2 11 of the act 2 under the reservoir doctrine they were also employer representatives for the purposes of collective ..... choice of representatives for 8 b 1 b purposes the reservoir doctrine and this chain of suppositions on which it rests cannot ..... s decision in florida power signified the demise of the reservoir doctrine there is surely no more interference with the actual process of .....

G. Chandrashekhar Reddy Vs. Marathwada University and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1987(2)BomCR409

..... they did that would be beyond their powers consequently therefore the doctrine of estoppel has no application secondly in the context of ..... bodies like the university vii conclusions and order i the doctrine of estoppel cannot be invoked in the circumstances of this ..... by virtue of any representation made by the university the doctrine of estoppel is not applicable iii the word aggregate simply .....

E. Muni Chengal Rao Vs. Tahsildar, Mambalam and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: (1988)IILLJ183AP

..... acquit or autrefois convict under the common law principles of english jurisprudence or the doctrine of double jeopardy of article 5 of the american constitution the departmental proceedings is ..... the evidence act are inapplicable to the proceedings under the departmental enquiry therefore the doctrine of autrefois acquit or issue estoppel does not apply to the departmental proceedings initiated .....