Doctrinal - Judgment Search Results

Red Lion Broadcasting Co., Inc. Vs. Fcc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... this area and knowingly preserved the fcc s complementary efforts we think the fairness doctrine and its component personal attack and political editorializing regulations are a legitimate exercise of ..... possession of a license serves the public interest iii the broadcasters challenge the fairness doctrine and its specific manifestations in the personal attack and political editorial rules on .....

Presbyterian Church Vs. Hull Church

Court: US Supreme Court

..... determine ecclesiastical questions in resolving property disputes and since the departure from doctrine element of georgia s implied trust theory requires civil courts to weigh ..... courts to decide church property disputes without resolving underlying controversies over religious doctrine hence states religious organizations and individuals must structure relationships involving church property .....

Benton Vs. Maryland

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s burglary sentence being reduced below five years so as to make the concurrent sentence doctrine inoperative is manifestly negligible footnote 2 7 cf e g sibron v new york 392 ..... restatement judgments 68 1 footnote 2 6 the court also suggests that the concurrent sentence doctrine should not be applied for the additional reason that the eventual length of petitioner s .....

Lear, Inc. Vs. Adkins

Court: US Supreme Court

..... monopolists without need or justification we think it plain that the technical requirements of contract doctrine must give way before the demands of the public interest in the typical situation page ..... owner even before this decision could not confidently rely upon the continuing vitality of the doctrine nor can we perceive that our decision today is likely to undermine any existing legitimate .....

Snyder Vs. Harris

Court: US Supreme Court

..... very persuasive circumstances enveloping congressional silence to debar this court from reexamining its own doctrines it is at best treacherous to find in congressional silence alone the adoption of ..... one in which there are very persuasive circumstances indicating congressional adoption of prior judicial doctrines is one where only by the most obvious fiction can congressional reenactment of a .....

Ragunath Prasad Jhunjhunwala and anr. Vs. Hind Overseas Private Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1971]41CompCas308(Cal)

..... majority view should prevail ordinarily it does not appear from the judgment that the extreme doctrine of the yenidje case was pressed before their lordships their lordships only considered the question ..... exception relying on the yenidje tobacco company case they were all trying to use the doctrine of yenidje tobacco company in support of their respective cases and each formulated certain principles .....

Mckart Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the particular administrative scheme involved perhaps the most common application of the exhaustion doctrine is in cases where the relevant statute provides that certain administrative procedures shall be ..... through its own processes correct most errors and thus avoid much litigation the exhaustion doctrine is assertedly necessary to compel resort to these processes the government also speculates .....

Desist Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... katz does not actually present a choice between prospective or retroactive application of new constitutional doctrine the court in that decision it is said did not depart from any existing ..... conversations were intercepted and recorded without a trespass and on the assertion that the olmstead doctrine was fully viable at the time that the petitioner s telephone conversations were overheard .....

Powell Vs. Mccormack

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the general criteria of justiciability this case is justiciable b political question doctrine 1 textually demonstrable constitutional commitment respondents maintain that even if this case is ..... forth in the constitution therefore the textual commitment formulation of the political question doctrine does not bar federal courts from adjudicating petitioners claims 2 other considerations respondents .....

Fortner Enterprises, Inc. Vs. United States Steel Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... coupled with a tie i would consider the arrangement per se illegal under conventional antitrust doctrine however i do not consider petitioner s allegations that u s steel lowered its price ..... or manufactured on the land unless another railroad offered more favorable terms although the tying doctrine originated under the specific language of 3 of the clayton act northern pacific was necessarily .....