Doctrinal - Judgment Search Results

Ali Mohd. Sheikh and ors. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: AIR1987J& K11

..... party would not be sufficient to press into aid the doctrine the doctrine of promissory estoppel can also not be invoked in ..... it is necessary to prevent fraud or manifest injustice the doctrine within the aforesaid limitations cannot be defeated on the plea ..... statutory prohibition or carrying out statutory obligations by invoking this doctrine the courts will only bind the government by its promises .....

Nagarmal Mahavir Prosad and anr. Vs. the Manager, United Bank of India ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1987Cal88,[1989]66CompCas292(Cal)

..... court in century spinning and v ulhas nagar municipal council 1970 3scr854 supra that the doctrine of promissory estoppel could not be defeated by invoking the defence of executive necessity ..... be defeated by invoking the defence of executive necessity suggesting by necessary implication that the doctrine of executive necessity is available to the government or public body to escape its obligation .....

Nantahala P. and L. Vs. Thornburg

Court: US Supreme Court

..... directly addressed by arkansas louisiana gas supra many state courts have applied the filed rate doctrine of montana dakota to decisions of state utility commissions and state courts that concern matters ..... power the similarity between this case and the more typical application of the filed rate doctrine is apparent from the impermissible interference that enforcement of ncuc s order would create with .....

Dow Chemical Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... instant case two additional fourth amendment claims are presented whether the common law curtilage doctrine encompasses a large industrial complex such as dow s and whether photography employing an ..... held to constitute a limit on fourth amendment protection yet the court applies the doctrine which affords heightened protection to homeowners in a manner that eviscerates the protection traditionally .....

Jyothi Home Industries Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1986KAR3831; [1987]64STC208(Kar)

..... the constitution and what it means today 1978 edn page 7 says this doctrine too considered as a judicially enforceable constitutional limitation has suffered enfeeblement especially within ..... plenary its essential legislative functions the three principles that govern delegation are first that doctrine of constitutional trust renders it imperative that the essential legislative functions shall be .....

Ohio Civ. Rgts. Comm'n Vs. Dayton Chr. Pub. Schs.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... decision but terminated the teacher because of her violation of the internal dispute resolution doctrine the teacher then filed a charge with appellant ohio civil rights commission alleging that ..... for challenging the nonrenewal decision in a manner inconsistent with the internal dispute resolution doctrine the board reviewed this decision and decided to terminate hoskinson it stated that the .....

United States Vs. Maine

Court: US Supreme Court

..... three part test is actually the standard for finding historic title and that a different doctrine the doctrine of ancient title is also a sufficient basis for identifying a historic bay under ..... of the report concerning nantucket sound specifically although massachusetts acquiesces in the determination that the doctrine of historic title does not support its claim it continues to maintain that it has .....

Collector of Customs Vs. Mansingka Brothers

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (1987)(13)LC717Tri(Kol.)kata

..... not incidental or by way of obiter in the result the doctrine of obiter dictum was not applicable in the present appeal case in ..... and ors air 1979 sc 621 supreme court discussed about the doctrine of promissory estoppel and held inter alia as follows the true ..... of the promisee and enforce the promise against the government the doctrine of promissory estoppel would be displaced in such a case because .....

J.K. Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1987(12)ECC389; 1987(10)LC307(Rajasthan); 1986(26)ELT703(Raj); 1986(2)WLN612

..... with the question of promissory estoppel hon ble the chief justice observed as under the doctrine of promissory estoppel represents a principle evolved by equity to avoid injustice and though commonly ..... against the government in the exercise of its governmental public or executive functions and the doctrine of executive necessity or freedom of future executive action cannot be invoked to defeat the .....

Davis Vs. Bandemer

Court: US Supreme Court

..... i believe that the proportional representation towards which the court s expansion of equal protection doctrine will lead is consistent with our history our traditions or our political institutions the court ..... 526 394 u s 534 n 4 1969 advances in computer technology achieved since the doctrine was announced have drastically reduced its deterrent value by permitting political cartographers to draw .....