Dock Worker - Judgment Search Results

Transport and Dock Workers Union Vs. M/S. Shree Sadguru Krupa Freight ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9512 OF2017NON-REPORTABLE TRANSPORT AND DOCK WORKERS UNION VERSUS APPELLANT(S) M/S. SHREE SADGURU KRUPA FREIGHT SERVICES RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.Hence, the questions raised in … IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9512 OF2017NON-REPORTABLE TRANSPORT AND DOCK WORKERS UNION VERSUS APPELLANT(S) M/S. SHREE SADGURU KRUPA FREIGHT SERVICES RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.Hence, the questions raised in this

Transport and Dock Workers Union Vs. Mumbai Port Trust

Court: Mumbai

1. The Transport and Dock Workers Union (Union) questions the award dated 8 November 2005 (impugned award) made by the Central Government Industrial … 1. The Transport and Dock Workers Union (Union) questions the award dated 8 November 2005 (impugned award) made by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal

Transport and Dock Workers Union and ors. Vs. Mumbai Port Trust and an ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2010(1)BomCR277

is as follows:At many points the Typist Cum- Computer Clerks had to work in shift timings of the docks and other operational departments for 8 hours. Thus in subsequent appointments a provision for working in shift timing … v. Union of India and Ors. : AIR 1982 SC 1473 to contend that a writ petition by workers, when they claim any violation of fundamental right, is maintainable. The learned Counsel also relied on the judgment

Transport and Dock Workers Union and anr. Vs. Chowgule Steamships Ltd. ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1997(4)BomCR33; (1997)3BOMLR387; 1997(1)MhLj574

which deals with 'daily hours' reads as follows : 'Subject to the provisions of Section 51, no adult worker shall be required or allowed to work in a factory for more than nine hours in any day

Transport and Dock Workers Union Vs. Bombay Stevedores Association and ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1993)ILLJ338Bom

the monthly rated staff employed by the members of the first Respondent-Association became governed by the Bombay Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Scheme, 1956, and became Registered Workers thereunder. The first Respondent thereupon took the stand that … 2. The petitioner is a registered trade union which represents, inter alia, the workmen employed in the Bombay Docks including the workmen employed by the individual members of the first Respondent which is an Association of the

Transport and Dock Workers Union Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1995(70)FLR193]

trade union have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for a declaration that the canteen workers employed through respondent Nos. 4 to 15 be treated as regular employees of Bombay Port Trust. The petitioners

Transport and Dock Workers Union Vs. Kandla Dock Labour Board and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1998)1GLR481

S.K. Keshote, J. 1. The petitioner, Transport & Dock Workers Union, through its Vice-president, Kandla Port, Kachchh, filed this Special Civil Application before this Court and following … S.K. Keshote, J. 1. The petitioner, Transport & Dock Workers Union, through its Vice-president, Kandla Port, Kachchh, filed this Special Civil Application before this Court and following prayers

Transport and Dock Workers' Union and Ors. Vs. Food Corporation of Ind ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1986(2)BomCR305

public and private sectors entitled to the benefits of the Shops Act. Thus, rights given to the FCI workers under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, had been violated. The right to earn CTA at the

F.C.i., Bombay and ors. Vs. Transport and Dock Workers Union and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1999)IILLJ1389SC; (1999)7SCC59

in Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (supra) and Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh v. Model Mills : (1984)IILLJ507SC as also in Workers Union v. Food Corporation of India : [1985]3SCR150 .3. The question was again considered by a three-Judge Bench

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(3)ALLMR119; 2007(2)BomCR753; (2007)109BOMLR620; [2007(113)FLR923]; (2007)2LLJ1085Bom

order, the Industrial Tribunal has made an observation to the effect that 'it is admitted position that the workers under reference are in employment for the last about 20 years. Hence, they have all right of employment