Divisive - Judgment Search Results
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Cross Fraser (Division by Agent Bhel)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-1998
Reported in: [2000]244ITR654(Mad)
R. Jayasimha Babu, J. 1. The questions referred to us at the instance of the Revenue and the assessee, arising out of the assessment of the income of the assessee-company, for the assessment years 1980-81 and...
A.J. Baskaran Vs. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Villupuram Di ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-27-2007
Reported in: (2007)3MLJ405
petitioner has rightly handed over possession of the shop to the Selection Grade Assistant Manager (Operation), TNSTC Villupuram Division-I, Mamandur.14. The circular issued by the respondent dated 12.7.2004 bearing circular No. 410 of 2004 clearly states that
Smt. Manjula Reddy W/O Late G. Srinivas, Assistant, K.S.R.T.C., Tumkur ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-23-2009
ORDERHuluvadi G. Ramesh, J.1. The petitioner in this petition has assailed the order of the 2nd respondent-authority at Annexure 'L' and sought for to issue writ of certiorari to quash the same and also to issue...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S Besco Limited [Foundry Division] Petitioner Through Vs. M/S Besco ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-25-2014
PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.27512 of 2013. [O&M].Date of Decision:25th February, 2014. M/s Besco Limited [Foundry Division].Petitioner through Mr.Siddharth Yadav and Mr.Pankaj Gupta, Advocates Versus State of Haryana & ORS.Respondents through Mr.Rupak Bansal, Addl. AG,
Central India Builders Vs. the Food Corporation of India Project Imple ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-03-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)ALLMR561; 2003(3)ARBLR586(Bom); 2003(6)BomCR264
F.I. Rebello, J. 1. Both the petitioners are being disposed of by common order. Arbitration Petition No. 191 of 2000 by the petitioners therein is to set aside the Award dated 20th November, 1989. Arbitration Petition...
Sundaram Industries Employees Union (Coach Division) Vs. Management of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-29-2000
Reported in: (2000)IILLJ990Mad
management and he suffered certain injuries. There was also a threat to the staff working in a particular division and the management received a communication regarding the threat by workmen and that particular division was closed. In
H.C.L. Ltd. (Reprographics Division) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-30-1988
Reported in: 1989(20)LC347(Allahabad)
respondents, we finally dispose of this writ petition with the direction that the Assistant Collector of Central Excise Division, Saharanpur, respondent no. 2, shall, within 14 days from the date of filing of a certified copy of
The Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Madras Ii Division Vs. Prit ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-17-1978
Reported in: 1979CENCUS222D
Clr. R.C. No. 853 of 1973 has been preferred by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Madas II Division, Madras purely on the question of sentence imposed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Poonamallee in his judgment, passed in
Workmen of Blundell Eomite Paints Limited (CochIn Division) Vs. Blunde ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-07-1973
Reported in: (1975)ILLJ463Ker
management prayed for time. Thereafter, on 25-12-1966 it retrenched all except two of its employees in the Cochin Division, with effect from 1-1-1967. It was this retrenchment that was the subject-matter of adjudication in I.D. No. 39
Workmen of Blundell Eomite Paints Ltd. (CochIn Division) Vs. Blundell ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-07-1973
Reported in: (1974)IILLJ23Ker
management prayed for time. Thereafter, on 25-12-1966 it retrenched all except two of its employees in the Cochin Division, with effect from 1-1-1967. It was this retrenchment that was the subject-matter of adjudication in I.D. No. 39
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free