Divagation - Judgment Search Results
The State of Karnataka and anr. Vs. Shri Ranganatha Reddy and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-11-1977
Reported in: AIR1978SC215; (1977)4SCC471; [1978]1SCR641
invest judicial power with capability to help solve the myriad problems of Mankind and Mother Earth.63. We have divagated to drive home the pertinence and power of poverty to change our social order through law and the
Girish Gandhi Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-22-2024
the contrary exists. Otherwise, an adivasi will be unfree in Free India, and likewise many other minorities. This divagation has become necessary to still the judicial beginnings, and to inhibit the process of making Indians aliens in
Om Prakash @ Israel @ Raju @ Raju Das versus Union of India and Anothe ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-08-2025
Reported in: [2025]1S.C.R.362
finest hour is not in meditating on abstractions but in being the delivery agent of full fairness. This divagation is justified by the need to remind ourselves that the grammar of justice according to law is not
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kailash Vijayvargiya Vs. Rajlakshmi Chaudhuri
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-04-2023
Crl.A. No.1581/2021 Etc. Page 58 of 63 abstractions but in being the delivery agent of full fairness. This divagation is justified by the need to remind ourselves that the grammar of justice according to law is not
Lalaram and Ors. Vs. Jaipur Devt.Auth. and Anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-01-2015
issued on 13.12.2001 was indeed a policy decision in conformity with the Rules and that any stand in divagation therefrom ought to be dismissed in limine.35. While rejecting the endeavour on the part of the respondents to
Pradeep Kumar Biswas and ors. Vs. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-16-2002
Reported in: 2002(50)BLJR1197; JT2002(4)SC146; 2002(3)SCALE638; (2002)5SCC111; [2002]3SCR100; (2002)2UPLBEC1798
that it is 'the State' and is subject to the same constitutional limitations as Government and itis this divagation which explains the ratio of Ramanna's case .89. The three-Judges Bench in The Workmen, Food Corporation of India
Moti Ram and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-24-1978
Reported in: AIR1978SC1594; 1978CriLJ1703; (1978)4SCC47; [1979]1SCR335; 1978(10)LC747(SC)
the contrary exists. Otherwise, an adivasi will be unfree in Free India, and likewise many other minorities. This divagation has become necessary to still the judicial beginnings, and to inhibit the process of making Indians aliens in
State of Kerala Vs. Kumari T.P. Roshana and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-20-1981
Reported in: AIR1979SC765; (1981)4SCC512
save where some sound basis has been laid.18. We get back to where we left off before this divagation into the Full Bench decision's ratio on discrimination as between the two universities. The sole question that survives
Shiv Mohan Singh Vs. the State (Delhi Administration)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-10-1977
Reported in: AIR1977SC949; 1977CriLJ767; (1977)2SCC238
under review before Parliament.11. This prolegomenon to the principles of capital sentence is our alibi for a brief divagation into the basics of infliction of depth as a weapon of extinction society uses against its terribly deviant
Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-25-1978
Reported in: AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621; MANU/SC/0133/1978; (1978) 1 SCC 243
M.H. Beg, C.J.1. The case before us involves questions relating to basic human rights. On such questions I believe that multiplicity of views giving the approach of each member of this Court is not a disadvantage...
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free