Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

District Judge - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 22 2002

ist Additional District Judge/Arbitrator and anr. Vs. Union of India ( ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: May-22-2002

Reported in: (2002)3UPLBEC2074

for appointment of an Arbitrator under Section 37 (1) of the Act. The appropriate Government thereafter appointed the District Judge/Additional District Judge, Meerut as Arbitrator under Section 37 (2) of the Act for determination of the compensation amount.3. … of an Arbitrator under Section 37 (1) of the Act. The appropriate Government thereafter appointed the District Judge/Additional District Judge, Meerut as Arbitrator under Section 37 (2) of the Act for determination of the compensation amount.3. The landholders


Sep 15 1998

Saleem Vs. District Judge, Muzaffarnagar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-15-1998

Reported in: JT1998(6)SC503; 1998(5)SCALE360; (1998)7SCC242; [1998]Supp1SCR625

applicable. Consequently, the suit for possession was decreed.5. The tenant unsuccessfully carried the matter in revision before the District Judge, Muzaffarnagar. After the revision was dismissed he approached the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad invoking its writ … Supreme Court in Madan Lal case. - 5. The tenant unsuccessfully carried the matter in revision before the District Judge, Muzaffarnagar. Even that apart reliance placed by the learned counsel for the appellant on the extract of sanction


Aug 24 2001

District Judge, Bahraich and anr. Vs. Munijar Prasad

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-24-2001

Reported in: [2001(91)FLR944]; JT2001(8)SC643; (2002)ILLJ461SC; (2002)10SCC425

Venkatarama Reddi, JJ.Leave granted.The respondent had been appointed as a driver purely on ad hoc basis by the District Judge, Bahraich vide order dated June 22, 1996. On certain charges of misconduct being framed against him he was … a charge-sheet and taking into consideration his reply, show cause notice was issued to the respondent by the District Judge along with a copy of the enquiry officer's report calling upon the respondent to show cause why he


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 15 1982

District Judge, Bijnor and anr. Vs. Raghubir Saran Bhatnagar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-15-1982

Reported in: (1982)2SCC383

per its judgment and order dated July 8, 1976 allowed the appeal and quashed the order of the District Judge compulsorily retiring the respondent, simultaneously directing reinstatement in service. Hence this appeal by special leave.2. It is not … employee and the fact that the Division Bench of the High Court had quashed the order of the District Judge compulsorily retiring the respondent from service and he was actually reinstated and rendered service and that now he


Jan 10 1983

Kanhialal Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-10-1983

Reported in: AIR1983SC351; (1983)3SCC32; 1983(2)SLJ528(SC)

the appellant before terminating his service, we are of the view that the order passed by the Learned District Judge terminating the service of the appellant must be held to be void. We accordingly allow the appeal and … the appellant. But while doing so, we may make it clear that it will be open to the District Judge or any other appropriate authority to take disciplinary action against the appellant, if thought fit and nothing that


Dec 15 2008

In Re: District Judge

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Dec-15-2008

Reported in: 2009(I)OLR352

Hon'ble Chief Justice of Orissa High Court & other companion Judges of the Court, seeking transfer of the District Judge, Puri on the ground that he misbehaved with Advocate, namely, Shri Manoj Kumar Mohapatra, while conducting the proceedings … Mishra, called a General Body meeting on 22.11.2008 which passed Resolution No. 25 raising the grievance against the District Judge, Puri and deciding to cease work in his Court and continue with the same till the District Judge


Jul 11 2013

District Judge Rohtak Under Section 26 of the Act. Vs. State of Haryan ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-11-2013

same notifications, however, moved references under Section 18 of the Act which were decided by the learned Additional District Judge-II, Rohtak by a common Award dated 29.9.1989, enhancing the amount of compensation for the acquired land. [4].The private … 2013.08.08 12:11 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP No.1333 of 1994 and connected cases. [2].District Judge, Rohtak under Section 26 of the Act. [3].The undisputed facts are that the land of respondent Nos.2 to


Mar 19 1997

District Judge and Registrar (Admn.) High Court Vs. N. Chandra Sekhar ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-19-1997

Reported in: 1997(3)ALT238

with 50% of the back wages from the date of dismissal till the date of his reinstatement. The District Judge, Eluru, West Godavari District and the Registrar (Administration) of the High Court have preferred this appeal under Clause … a Clerk of the Court, however, deposed and the Enquiry Officer held that the charge was proved. The District Judge decided to impose the punishment of dismissal. There is nothing, however, on the record to show that the


Sep 24 1999

Bekaru Vs. District Judge, Sidharth Nagar and Others

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Sep-24-1999

Reported in: 2000(1)AWC149

the order passed by the Prescribed Authority in the said Election Petition No. 41 of 1995. The learned District Judge, Siddharth Nagar by its order dated 2nd March, 1996 has dismissed the said Revision No. 2 of 1995 … have been given retrospective effect. He also relies upon the decision of the Raghav Prasad v. Special Judge/Additional District Judge, Gorakhpur and others, 1999 (90) RD 481, in support of hiscontention that the petitioner cannot take the benefit


Jan 23 2002

Jagdish Vs. District Judge, Kanpur and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-23-2002

Reported in: 2002(1)AWC766

The Court of Judge Small Causes, relying upon the decision in the case of Nootan Kumar v. Additional District Judge, 1993 (2) AWC 1090 : AIR 1994 All 298, held that the agreement executed between the landlord and


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial